ei: “I do not struggle alone”

By Dina Awad and Hazem Jamjoum writing from Ramallah, occupied West Bank, Live from Palestine, 15 July 2008

To view original article, published by Electronic Intifada, click here

Photo by Dina Awad

Ibrahim Bornat, 25, from the village of Bil’in in the occupied West Bank, was shot three times in the left thigh with dum-dum bullets by the Israeli occupation forces (IOF) on 13 June 2008. Like he does every week, Ibrahim was protesting against the construction of the separation wall in his village, which will effectively result in the annexation of 58 percent of the lands by Israel. One of the bullets Ibrahim was shot with that day hit the major artery in his leg, expanding and causing major nerve damage. He lost so much of his rare AB+ blood type that an urgent alert was sent out on the radio, the Internet and at local mosques for blood donations. As Ibrahim currently lies in pain at Ramallah Hospital, he does not know if he will ever be able to walk again.

“It felt like they were trying to shoot my leg off,” says Ibrahim about the 13 June incident. The Israeli army frequently uses live ammunition at Bil’in, injuring many peace activists, sometimes quite seriously. Ibrahim, by his own admission, had been fired at and hit 77 times prior to this instance, which brings his total number of injuries to 80. Most noticeable on his body is a large gash in the center of his forehead, which comes courtesy of an Israeli soldier firing a tear gas canister at his head from close range. Ibrahim’s skull was fractured from the impact and he suffers serious memory problems.

Dum-dum bullets, the type of bullets which caused the injury to Ibrahim’s leg, are designed to expand upon impact. These bullets sometimes fragment when they enter the body. This expansion and fragmentation causes a much larger wound than would occur with a regular bullet, and results in greater blood loss and trauma. The use of expanding bullets is banned according to the 1899 Hague Convention. It’s extremely painful, save inhumane, for anyone to be hit by a single dum-dum bullet to the body, and in the case of Ibrahim, three of these expanding bullets entered the same area. His doctors have said that it would be a near miracle for him to walk again. On 28 September 2000, the first day of the second Palestinian intifada, Ibrahim’s older brother Rani was shot in the neck by an Israeli-fired dum-dum bullet that caused near complete paralysis of his body. Today, Rani can only move his head and left arm.

When Ibrahim was admitted to Ramallah Hospital, there was a shortage of blood reserves of his rare blood type, as well as a shortage of the medications necessary for his treatment. Thanks to the urgent appeal, enough blood was donated to save his life. The medication needed for his recovery costs over 1,300 NIS a week (roughly $400 US). His friends raised the needed funds for the medication in the first few weeks after he was injured. Since then, the hospital has obtained the medications, but it is uncertain how reliable the source will be and Ibrahim now worries about continuing to obtain the resources for his recovery which will likely take a year. “Where is the Palestinian Authority in all of this?” asks Ibrahim, “No official acknowledgment of my sacrifice has come from them. You would think that I acted alone that day, and not for the liberation of all of Palestine.”

The Palestinian Authority’s (PA) Ministry of Health is supposed to cover the medical expenses of those injured by the IOF. However, the ministry’s services are notorious for being far more efficient and generous for those with connections to PA officials. As Ibrahim discusses the shortcomings of health-care under occupation, he points bitterly across the street at the Shaikh Zayid hospital. Named after the ruler of the United Arab Emirates, a mass fundraising campaign was launched in 1996 to build the hospital in the wake of intifadat al-nafaq, a series of battles between Palestinians and the Israeli military over the tunnels dug underneath Jerusalem’s Haram al-Sharif that lasted for more than 40 days in 1996. “For weeks the PA had advertisements in every sort of media imaginable to raise money for that hospital,” says Ibrahim’s brother-in-law who visits him regularly at the hospital. “Everyone I know, including Ibrahim, pitched in one way or another to help build it.” The Shaikh Zayid hospital is now a private hospital where, as Ibrahim explained, “even if you’re bleeding to death, they ask you for your health insurance before thinking to stop the life from leaving your body. Poor people like us are basically not allowed on the property.”

According to Suleiman Deek, Director of the Martyrs’ Families and Injured Care Establishment of the PA, Palestinians who have been injured demonstrating against the IOF are supposed to get the entirety of their medical fees taken care of by the Ministry of Health. Ibrahim says that the PA has not helped him cover extra fees, even though he has personally approached a high-level representative for aid. When asked to comment on Ibrahim’s case, Deek suggested that Ibrahim’s family submit the receipts of the extra costs he has incurred since his injury for a reimbursement of up to 600 NIS ($180 US) a month. However, this would represent a minor part of the total costs he has incurred, and the reimbursement is not guaranteed.

No other injury sustained by Ibrahim has proven to be as debilitating as this one. Prior to being shot that day, Ibrahim was very active in Palestine’s struggle for freedom. He was a visible member of Bil’in’s popular committee against the wall. As a Fatah activist, he worked on the Popular Campaign to Free Marwan Barghouti and all Palestinian Political Prisoners. He held the post of the president of the Palestinian Students’ Support Fund, a group that works to help underprivileged students. He is also an artist, most recently putting on the exhibit From the Scent of Bil’in’s Wall to commemorate the ongoing Nakba in Palestine, art that uses IOF bullets and munitions as its main material. All of these activities were done on a volunteer basis.

Now Ibrahim finds himself immobilized in his cramped hospital room. “I can’t tell you how bad the situation is in Ramallah Hospital,” he says. “It’s dirty, claustrophobic, the nurses are overstretched, overworked, and unresponsive, and they lack many basic medications. But I am thankful for my doctors, because what they have managed to do to my leg already through their operations is remarkable … Palestinian doctors have to perform several miracles a day. I’ve spent so much of my life in hospitals that I should know.”

After being shot, Ibrahim spent seven days in intensive care. He had three operations in two weeks to attempt to patch up his fragmented artery and reconstruct his leg. The doctors implanted a vein and a nerve as well as a plastic artery. The doctors then had to clean up the damage caused by the exploding bullets by removing much of the thigh tissue. There is one more operation left aimed at helping him regain motor use of his foot. There is hope that what is left of his muscles will regenerate. However, an unanticipated twist presented itself recently, when Ibrahim woke up in the middle of the night to find his leg bleeding profusely from the latest operation. He yelled for help, but no qualified doctors were on duty. Weak and dizzy, he phoned his parents, who came from Bil’in to try and contain the blood. The neurosurgeon qualified to operate on his injury only came to the hospital hours later to treat him, by that time the situation was so bad that he had to operate immediately, and Ibrahim was given no sedatives. Now it is a waiting game. Ibrahim hopes to soon be transferred from Ramallah Hospital to a rehabilitation center, where he will undergo physiotherapy for up to a year to try and get him back on his feet. In spite of the complications, Ibrahim remains hopeful that he will be able to walk.

Ibrahim seems unsure as to whether he will go back to actively participating in his village’s demonstration against the wall once he regains his mobility. At first he says that he will no longer participate in demonstrations to show his opposition to the occupation, but struggle through his art. But after a few moments of silence, he exclaims that he is determined to go back to the demonstrations just to show the Israeli soldiers stationed there that they have not broken his spirit. Whether he returns to demonstrate in Bil’in or not, his recovery is proving to be long and arduous. He knows it may take a while, and he waxes poetic from his hospital bed: “for me, physical rehabilitation is all about morale. Morale for me comes from visitors who remind me that I demonstrated for all of Palestine that day. It comes from recognition from others that I do not struggle alone, that my injuries and physical scars are not in vain.”

Dina Awad is a Canadian of Palestinian origin who is currently living and working in Ramallah.

Hazem Jamjoum is the Media and Information officer of the Badil Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights and can be reached at mediaenglish AT badil DOT org.

Haaretz: The general of onions and garlic

By Gideon Levy

To view original article, published by Haaretz on the 13th July, click here

Here is the “next thing” in the war against terror: the war against hairdressers. After Hamas took over half the Palestinian people, in no small measure because of Israel’s policies, after we tried to fight Hamas with weapons and siege, destruction and killing, mass arrests and deportations, the Israel Defense Forces and Shin Bet security service have invented something new: a war on shopping malls, bakeries, schools and orphanages. First in Hebron, now in Nablus. The IDF is closing beauty salons, clothing stores and clinics, and even one dairy farm, all on the pretext that they are connected to Hamas, or the rent they pay is given to a terror organization.

These bizarre pictures of a closure order issued by the general of command, stuck on the window of a cosmetics store or a physiotherapy center, of a confiscation order stuck to a pita oven, show that the Israeli occupation has gone crazy. A few months ago I visited the charity institutions and commercial centers the IDF has begun closing in Hebron; I saw infuriatingly absurd scenes. A modern school, intended for 1,200 students, standing closed on orders of the GOC, and a library for young people about to shut.

Thus the occupation proves once again that there is no place in Palestinians’ lives that it cannot reach, and that it has no boundaries: An army that closes a school, library, bakery and boarding school; soldiers who raid a licensed commercial television station, confiscating its equipment and threatening its closure, as happened recently at the Afaq TV station in Nablus.

In Israel no voices were raised in protest, of course, either against the closing of the school or the closing of the TV station. According to the Israeli train of thought, if we close a bakery making bagels for orphans, Hamas’ power will weaken; if we throw hundreds of needy children into the streets from their boarding school, they and their relatives will become sympathetic to Israel; if we close a crowded shopping mall, its irate owners and customers will become Fatah supporters.

The Israeli occupation has not been seen for a long time in such a ludicrous and inhumane light as in these closure and confiscation operations ordered by GOC Central Command Gadi Shamni, the general of onions and garlic, to judge by the produce his soldiers confiscated from the Hebron food warehouses. Illegal, certainly immoral, but no less shortsighted, these operations broadcast a message loud and clear: The occupation has lost all moral inhibitions and any shred of wisdom. How wretched is an army that empties storerooms of food and clothing for the needy, how ridiculous that the GOC signs orders to close hairdressing salons, how pathetic is a military raid on bakeries and how cruel is an occupation that shuts down clinics on any pretext.

Hamas has entered the vacuum created in the West Bank and Gaza. Like any religious movement, it sprouted in the soil of distress and poverty. Now Israel comes along and says let’s make the poverty and distress even worse. Why? To fight Hamas. There is nothing more absurd. Tens of thousands of poor children in the West Bank have nowhere to turn to aside from the Islamic charities that Israel suspects of being linked to Hamas, although many were established long before the organization was born. Israel stopped seeing to the population’s welfare under the occupation, despite its obligation under international law, and the Palestinian Authority is also not showing any special interest in social and economic needs. Fatah has always devoted more resources to military camps, guns and official cars than to orphanages, hospital beds and dialysis machines.

This is the vacuum the Islamic Movement is filling, offering an impressive level of services. The orphanage I visited in Hebron is one of the most beautiful and well-cared for I have seen. It takes quite a bit of cruelty to threaten its closure, quite a bit of audacity to argue that doing so will serve the war on terror, and quite a bit of stupidity to think that such a measure will help. The closing of stores and malls will only land another blow on the Palestinian economy, which even now is struggling to hold up under conditions of quarantine. Has Israel learned nothing from the failure of the siege on Gaza?

Anyone who visits the charity institutions would see that not all the money flowing to these organizations is earmarked for buying suicide belts and explosives. The West Bank’s residents cannot be simultaneously imprisoned, prohibited from earning a living and offered no social-welfare assistance while we strike at those who are trying to do so, whatever their motives. If Israel wants to fight the charitable associations, it must at least offer alternative services. On whose back are we fighting terror? Widows? Orphans? It’s shameful.

The National: Protesters target Israeli jeweller

By Sharmila Devi, Foreign Correspondent

To view original article, published by The National in Abu Dhabi on 12th July, click here

NEW YORK – Human rights protesters took to the streets in New York last week to continue their campaign against an Israeli billionaire who is suspected of building settlements in the occupied West Bank.

Adalah-NY, a Jewish-Palestinian umbrella group of activists, vowed to maintain pressure on Lev Leviev, a real estate and diamond mogul who is one of the richest men in Israel, over his suspected activities in the West Bank and to prevent him from opening more Leviev diamond jewellery stores in Dubai.

“There is growing awareness around the world about Leviev’s blatant human rights abuses,” said Daniel Lang-Levitsky, a spokesman for Jews Against the Occupation, which is part of Adalah-NY.

Unicef, the United Nations children’s agency, announced last month it would not accept any financial contributions from Leviev companies after finding “at least reasonable grounds for suspecting” they were building settlements in defiance of international law.

Mr Leviev is the chairman of Africa Israel Investments, a global conglomerate.

One of its units is Danya Cebus, which activists say is helping to construct the settlement of Zufim on land taken from the Palestinian village of Jayyous in the northern West Bank.

There is one Leviev store at the Mina Al Salam hotel in Dubai; plans to open more shops appear to be on hold while the Arab League’s Central Boycott Office in Damascus considers its position.

About 20 people gathered on a rainy afternoon outside the Leviev store on Madison Avenue on Wednesday for the latest in a string of protests that started last year. Wednesday was the fourth anniversary of the International Court of Justice’s ruling that Israel’s separation barrier illegally annexed Palestinian land.

Just inside the store, protected by a New York police cordon, a burly security guard in a suit stood behind a window display of diamonds and a printed list of Leviev store locations – London, New York, Moscow and Dubai.

The protesters chanted such slogans as “you sparkle, you shine, but settlements are still a crime” and “you’re glitzy, you’re glam, you’re stealing Palestinian land”. Many people walking past, including glamorous Upper East Side ladies, looked bemused but many took a leaflet.

“Our movement is providing a model for other campaigns in the boycott movement,” said Riham Barghouti, a spokesman for Adalah-NY, who is from Ramallah and works as a teacher in Brooklyn.

“Our main message to supporters either here or in the United Arab Emirates is that in spite of the difficulties, it is possible to get together and protest against human rights violations.”

Mr Leviev’s public relations staff would not comment. In an interview with Ha’aretz, an Israeli newspaper, this year, the usually media-shy Mr Leviev said he would build in the Palestinian territories as long as he had permission from Israel.

He said “groups that are funded by business competitors” were behind the protests but offered no evidence.

The Adalah-NY grassroots campaign – including protests, letters to the media and internet activism – is sharply focused against Mr Leviev and his business activities in the West Bank but also supports striking miners at his companies in Namibia and rent-controlled tenants at properties owned by the businessman in New York.

Although Adalah-NY is a small group, it said its effect was illustrated by Unicef’s rejection of further financial contributions from Mr Leviev.

Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, which fights anti-Semitism, defends Mr Leviev.

“The decision not to accept assistance from Mr Leviev smacks of selective political discrimination,” Mr Foxman said. “This decision only gives legitimacy to those who would seek to promote a boycott of the state of Israel and its supporters.”

The debate was taken up by Richard Silverstein, who runs the liberal Tikun Olam website.

“I’ve been following Adalah’s energetic, months-long campaign against Russo-Israeli diamond baron Lev Leviev with great interest. Not so much because I agree with Adalah’s politics regarding the I-P [Israel-Palestine] conflict but because I find Leviev’s political, commercial and religious interests to be so odious,” he wrote. “Through an imaginative, tenacious campaign they have nipped at Leviev’s heels all over the globe where he maintains commercial interests.”

Ynet: Na’alin residents: IDF curfew made us stronger

Residents of West Bank village say will continue to protest construction of Israeli security fence

By Ali Waked

To view original article, published by Ynet on the 8th July, click here

Residents of the West Bank village of Na’alin near Ramallah vowed Tuesday to continue their protest against Israel’s construction of the security fence.

Monday evening the Israeli army lifted a curfew it had imposed on the village over the weekend due to violent rallies that were recently

held there in protest of the fence. Earlier in the day some 200 Palestinians, left-wing activists and foreign citizens held rallied against the curfew. Security forces dispersed the demonstrators with the use of rubber bullets and tear gas. Three protestors were detained during the clashes.

Following the demonstration officers from the IDF Coordination and Liaison Office held a meeting with representatives of the Popular Committee Against the Wall, after which it was decided that the army would lift the curfew. The committee members, however, said they would continue protesting against the fence’s construction.

“The curfew and siege only made us more united,” said committee member Ibrahim Amira, “we told the officers we wouldn’t stop our struggle if they don’t halt the construction and reroute the fence to the Green Line.”