B’Tselem to Attorney General: Stop reckless use of rubber-coated steel bullets

To view original press release published by B’Tselem click here

B’Tselem’s data indicate that security forces have adopted a practice of reckless firing of rubber-coated steel bullets in the West Bank, killing two Palestinians and injuring many more since the beginning of the year.


Photo by B’Tselem

Since the intifada began, 21 Palestinians have been killed by rubber-coated steel bullet fire, a measure that is meant to be non-lethal.The organization has requested Attorney General Menachem Mazuz to stop the illegal firing and prosecute both soldiers and police officers who violate the Open-Fire Regulations and commanders who condone the trigger-happy attitude.

Early this morning, ‘Awwad Sadeq Sror, a mentally disabled father of four from Ni’lin, was severely injured when a soldier fired a cylinder containing three rubber-coated steel bullets at him from short range. B’Tselem’s initial investigation indicates that two bullets penetrated his skull and a third struck him in the chest.

The recent wave of similar cases, which led to B’Tselem’s request, raises the grave suspicion that soldiers and Border Police officers systematically breach the Open-Fire Regulations in their use of rubber-coated bullets, often with the knowledge and approval of officers. The request included a list of 19 cases B’Tselem has investigated in which soldiers and police officers fired rubber-coated bullets from potentially lethal short ranges, although the forces were not in a life-threatening situation. The organization also reported cases in which children were shot and in which security forces fired with the intention of wounding and punishing Palestinians.

B’Tselem knows of only one case in which an indictment has been filed against security forces for breaching the Open-Fire Regulations. The failure to prosecute offenders conveys to soldiers, police officers, and commanders that they will not be held accountable for killing or wounding Palestinians, and encourages a trigger-happy attitude among the forces.

Ynet: Left-wing groups call for IDF probe into Naalin shooting

Palestinian lawmaker Mustafa Barghouti says Defense Minister Barak, soldiers responsible for critical injury of mentally ill Palestinian in West Bank village should be tried by International Criminal Court in Hague. Rights groups urge attorney general, judge advocate general to launch investigation into incident

By Ali Waked

To view original article, published by Ynet on the 1st September, click here

Left-wing organizations have called for a military investigation into the critical injury of a mentally ill Palestinian by rubber-coated steel bullets fired at him in the West Bank village of Naalin on Monday.

The organizations appealed to Judge Advocate General Avihai Mandelblit and Attorney General Menachem Mazuz and urged them to probe the matter.

Many neighbors flocked Monday to the Srur family home following the injury of one of its sons, Ayed Awad.

Abu Mahmoud, one of the neighbors who witnessed the incident, told Ynet what he saw.

“The infantry force which raided the house came from between the olive trees. Shortly before 3 am, they entered the Srur family home, located at the end of the village. The soldiers wanted to go up to the second floor to arrest Ayed’s brother, Aked, but Ayed told them to wait until the women evacuate themselves to a hidden place.

“The troops began pushing Ayed, dropping him and yelling at him. Ayed’s son, Muhammad, asked them to be patient with his father, explaining that he is ill, but these pleas did no good.

“The soldiers shoved Ayed once and again, until he and his entire family members – including his blind daughter who couldn’t stop crying – were all put in a room. They went up, took Aked and dragged him down the stairs.”

According to Abu-Mahmoud, when the soldiers left, Ayed stood at the entrance to the house and yelled at them, “Leave my brother, leave my brother.”

At that moment, he claimed, one of the soldiers turned around and shot a number of bullets at him from a distance of about 2.5 meters (8.2 feet).

“I quickly entered my house, while hearing the shots accompanied by shock grenades and the voices of women crying,” he added. “I then went to the neighbors’ house and knocked on the door. The soldiers shouted from the inside, ‘Army, army, go away.’ But they eventually opened the door. I saw Ayed dying there, and the house was filled with blood. The soldiers didn’t even come to his aid.”

Kassem, the oldest Srur brother, told Ynet that his injured brother can’t even talk.

“He stutters badly, and all he asked was that the soldiers wait before breaking into the house and rooms because there were people inside,” he said. “At first the troops shoved and dropped him, but he continued to say to them, ‘Wait, wait.’ They must have thought that he was irritated with them, so they decided to silence him.”

The IDF stated earlier that the injured man was shot while attempting to snatch a weapon from one of the soldiers, who responded by firing one bullet in self defense. The army added that the brother then closed himself in a room and refused to receive medical treatment.

‘No justification for shooting unarmed man’

The Naalin incident sparked a row in the Palestinian Authority. Dr. Mustafa Barghouti, a parliament member, said that Defense Minister Ehud Barak and the IDF soldiers who took part in the incident should be tried by the The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

Barghouti condemned what he defined as “the international community’s silence in light of the ongoing Israeli crimes,” claiming that “Israel’s brutal policy is aimed at breaking the non-violent popular protest model implemented in Naalin, Bilin and other places where Israel operates with unrestrained violence.”

The Yesh Din human rights organization called on the judge advocate general to instruct the army to launch an immediate investigation into the shooting incident.

“There cannot be any justification for shooting a bullet at the head of an unarmed man during an arrest attempt,” said the organization’s research director, Lior Yavne.

“Unfortunately, the Military Prosecution’s policy, which prevents the launching of probes into shooting incidents, conveys a message to IDF soldiers in the territory that they can shoot first and will usually not be questioned later.”

’21 killed by rubber bullets’

The B’Tselem human rights group appealed to Attorney General Mazuz and urged him to work to “stop the illegal shooting” and instruct the army to prosecute soldiers and police officers who have violated open-fire orders to the full extent of the law, as well as the commanders who allow the shooting.

According to B’Tselem, an initial investigation into the Monday morning’s incident revealed that two bullets had infiltrated Srur’s skull and a third one hit him in the chest.

“The security forces have adopted a practice of lawless shooting of rubber-coated steel bullets in the West Bank, which has led to the death of two Palestinians since the beginning of the year, and to the injury of numerous people.

“Since the start of the second intifada, 21 Palestinians have been killed by the firing of such bullets, which are supposed to be nonlethal,” a group official said.

The organization said it decided to approach Mazuz following a wave of similar incidents which have taken place recently.

“The repetition of these incidents raises a heavy suspicion that soldiers and Border Guard officers are systematically violating the open-fire orders for the use of rubber-coated steel bullets, sometimes with the knowledge and consent of officers.”

B’Tselem’s letter to the attorney general included a list of 19 incidents documented by the organization’s investigators, in which they claim soldiers and police officers fired rubber bullets from very close ranges, causing them to be fatal. The organization also said it had documentations of incidents in which children were shot at and incident in which soldiers fired at Palestinians in order to deliberately cause injuries or punish them.

Haaretz: Caught on camera

By Gideon Levy

To view original article, published by Haaretz on the 28th August, click here

This is Israeli justice in a nutshell: Lt. Col. Omri Burberg, the battalion commander suspected of giving an utterly illegal order to shoot a bound Palestinian, is wandering free and being considered for a senior training post in the Israel Defense Forces. Meanwhile, Jamal Amira, the father of Salam, the amateur camera operator who filmed the shooting, spent 26 days in an Israeli jail, until a military judge was so kind as to release him on bail last week.

“Although the claim that the IDF sought revenge is weak,” wrote Lt. Col. Yoram Haniel, the military judge, “one cannot overlook the fact that out of all the protestors, only the complainant was arrested.”

Indeed, it can’t be overlooked. Jamal Amira was arrested just after after B’Tselem released the video, filmed by his daughter, of the horrible shooting of the bound Palestinian man. He says that when the Border Police officers arrested him, they called out to one another, “We caught Salam’s father.” Amira, 53, a father of nine, has many Israeli friends, including a senior IDF reserves officer. Amir was thrown into Ofer Prison in what can only be interpreted as an act of revenge by those who presented themselves as “friends of Omri.”

In Na’alin, the village presently embroiled in a resolute and brave civil struggle over the remainder of its land, on which Israel seeks to build the separation fence, celebrated Amira’s release this week. But Amira went straight from the prison to the graves of two men from the village who died in the fight for their land: Ahmed Moussa, 11, and Yussef Amira, 22. Only later was he available to join the party and fete dozens of visitors, among them his Israeli friends from nearby Moshav Shilat.

Over the weekend, the villagers of Na’alin once again rushed one of their friends to the Ramallah hospital: Hitham Alian, 21, was shot in the head on the way to visit his grandfather. The image of his bleeding head adorns almost every mobile phone in Na’alin.

“This is a closed military zone,” barked the Border Police thugs who welcomed us at the checkpoint closing off Na’alin, barring our entrance to the village. A few minutes later, the officers disappeared and the closed military zone suddenly turned into an open civilian zone, if just for a moment. A scratchy loudspeaker called the children of the village to a back-to-school party, and the gravel road to the ancient olive grove – the one Israel plans to expropriate and uproot – was carpeted with stones, a reminder of the daily struggle here. Israel is building the fence to the east of the Green Line, with the sole purpose of expanding the borders of Kiryat Sefer and Hashmonaim, the two large settlements already constructed on land stolen from Bil’in and Na’alin. How do the ultra-Orthodox residents of Kiryat Sefer and the people looking for “high quality of life” in Hashmonaim feel, knowing the land underneath their houses was robbed from others? It probably doesn’t keep them up at night, but when they stand in front of the spectacular valley of olives, and they see how the fence route tears Na’alin’s farmers from their groves, the heart cannot help but notice. Roughly 57,000 dunam (about 13,500 acres) before 1948 turned into 33,000 dunam before 1967, and now the 5,000 residents of the village are about to be left with only 7,000 dunam. The fence will rip away from them an additional 2,500 dunam.

“All we can do now is stare at the ceiling,” says Jamal Amira, who stands to lose 138 dunam to the glory of the separation fence and Hashmonaim.

“I’m sure there will be farmers who will have heart attacks when olive picking season arrives and they can’t get to their trees,” says his son Mohammed, who terms what is happening the “new occupation of Na’alin” and the separation fence “the theft fence.”

In a white galabiya and fluent Hebrew, Jamal offers us figs, “my last figs.” The sound of the bulldozers is in the distance, and Amira is barred from approaching his land due to a restraining order. After his arrest 70 of his olive trees were cut down and two wells on his property were destroyed. Mohammed is convinced that this too was in revenge for his sister’s documentation of the shooting, because he was promised the wells wouldn’t be touched.

On Sunday, July 20, Salam filmed the shooting of Ashraf Abu Rahma, who was bound at the time. The video was made public the following day by B’Tselem, which had given Salam the video camera.

“At first we couldn’t believe it,” recalls Mohammed, who was standing next to Salam as she filmed. “We were sure the officer would put Ashram into the jeep. In the evening, when we saw the video, we were happy. We were happy to have released such a thing into the world. We wanted to show the world, and especially the Israeli Defense Ministry, what IDF soldiers are doing to us. Come see the actions of the battalion commander, a lieutenant colonel with two ‘falalels’ [oak-leaf clusters], the commander of Na’alin. First he imposed a total curfew on us, a closure on 5,000 people to guard a couple of tractors, and now this shooting.”

“Omri” had long been vilified in Na’alin, following the five-day curfew on the village and his rude behavior to the residents. “Put that kind of officer in Lebanon, but why in Na’alin?” asks Jamal.

Mohammed says they were afraid, at first, to publicize the video. “We were scared the army would do something to us. The B’Tselem people promised us that nothing bad would happen to us. But our fears came true. There was revenge. After two days, my father was arrested. After three days, I was shot in the leg with a rubber bullet while leaving my house. We don’t have one unbroken window in our house. Sometimes the soldiers ask me, ‘Have you filmed us today?’ That’s how it’s been every day since then.”

Three days after the video was released, on July 23, a women’s demonstration took place in the olive groves, and Jamal joined. The villagers always make sure that one of the owners whose land is about to be taken accompanies every protest. Jamal began arguing with the Border Police officers, one of whom told Jamal the land was not his. Jamal, furious, began devouring clods of earth. His son Ghaleb watched from a distance as officers attacked and kicked his father. The family has a video to prove it. Jamal was put into the jeep. He was handcuffed and blindfolded. He heard the officers say to each other, “We caught Salam’s father, the camerawoman’s father.”

He was driven to Hashmonaim, where he says he was left sitting on the ground for about three hours. He asked for water and was refused. After several hours, officers poured water on his face. “Omri is my friend,” Jamal says one of the officers told him. They eventually brought him to a Border Police base next to Maccabim and left him handcuffed in the jeep for another three or four hours, still with no water. He says many Border Police officers came to see “Salam’s father.” When he asked for water again, he says one of them responded, “Eat your camera.” “I’ll screw you” is another sentence from an officer that Jamal hesitates to quote.

After sunset Jamal was brought to Beit El for questioning. He was charged with assaulting Border Police officers. Eventually he was taken to Ofer Prison. That first night he suffered from pains in his ribs that he attributes to the blows he received during the demonstration. The following morning he was seen by a doctor.

After eight days in jail Jamal was brought to court. He is effusive in his praise for Gaby Lasky, the human rights lawyer brought to defend him, but she was unable to secure his release at the first military court hearing. His remand was extended until the end of proceedings, and Jamal remained in jail for over two weeks before his appeal was heard.

Some of his Israeli friends came the court hearings. He asks for them to be named: Col. (res.) Ami Arazi, Shlomo Rav-On, Rafi Reuveni and Ilan Kuperstein of Shilat. Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad and MP Mustafa Barghouti visited his home while he was in jail. The family has a photo of Fayyad with Salam, the camera operator and heroine of the family.

The Border Police and the IDF did not issue a response before press time.

Jamal can certainly be considered a “good Arab.” In his first hearing, he told the prosecutor that he has done much for Israel. “Just move the fence to the wadi, and I’ll drink coffee on the fence with any Israeli,” he says repeatedly. His sons all speak Hebrew well. Their home is the first house after the IDF checkpoint at the entrance to Na’alin and they host many Israeli guests there. He fears he will no longer be able to offer them figs and olive oil from his groves. After his release from jail, after a series of delays and humiliations, half the village was waiting for him at the checkpoint.

Jamal’s trial will take place soon. He is charged with disrupting the peace, assaulting a soldier and entering a closed military zone – his private property. Military court judge Lt. Colonel Yoram Haniel wrote, “It is doubtful that the evidence in the case will lead to a conviction.”

Ynet: Military judge – Naalin arrest unfounded

Military court orders release of father of girl who documented IDF soldier firing rubber bullets at bound Palestinian in Naalin, accuses prosecution, police of being unprofessional. Father’s attorney: ‘Release proves arrest was out of vengeance’

By Ali Waked

To view original article, published by Ynet on the 18th August, click here

The Judea and Samaria Military Court of Appeals on Sunday ordered the release of Jamal Amira, the 53-year old father of Salaam Amira, the girl who documented the Naalin shooting incident in which an IDF soldier can be seen firing rubber bullets at a bound Palestinian.

The judge who ordered the man’s release reprimanded the prosecution and said that the three charges against the defendant – violation of an enclosed military space, participation in a protest, and assault of a soldier – lacked evidence. The judge expressed the questionability of the charges by asking, “Why was the father of the girl arrested out of all those protesting at the time?”

The judge determined that the defendant made a valid point when he said the protest had been peaceful, and that he saw no evidence of assault. He ordered the defendant’s release pending $2,100 in bail.

The father’s attorney, Gabi Laski, said the decision “confirms our preliminary claim that the arrest was out of vengeance and punishment for the video filmed by the girl.” She added that the prosecution should not disregard claims such as these before choosing to indict, and that the judge had reprimanded police for being unprofessional.

“If the prosecution sees that the material is insufficient it should request additional material rather than use it as the basis for the claim,” Laski said, referring to the lack of evidence. She claimed that the judge’s decision is significant because it implies that protests in Naalin are not a felony.

“It’s time we realized that the Palestinians living under occupation have the right of freedom of expression and freedom to protest, especially when a judge determines that the protest is non-violent, so why prevent it? The police and army must comprehend that not every protest is a violation of public order,” she said.