An independent fact-finding committee calls for the prosecution of Israeli political leaders and members of the military

30 May 2009

An independent fact-finding committee (IFFC) established by the League of Arab States (LAS) to investigate and report on violations of human rights and international humanitarian law arising out of Israel’s offensive in Gaza from 27 December 2008 to 18 January 2009, code named Operation Cast Lead, has submitted a report to the LAS in which it finds that there is sufficient evidence to substantiate prosecutions of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The report also finds that the Israeli political leadership is responsible for such crimes.

The IFFC, comprising of Professor John Dugard (South Africa, Chairman), Professor Paul de Waart (the Netherlands) , Judge Finn Lynghjem (Norway), Advocate Gonzalo Boye (Chile / Germany), Professor Francisco Corte Real (Portugal) and Ms Raelene Sharp (Australia: Rapporteur), bases its findings on a visit to Gaza, during which it interviewed victims and witnesses of the conflict and visited sites of destruction, and on official publications of the Israeli government and NGO’s operating in the Territory. This evidence showed convincingly that the IDF had failed to distinguish between military and civilian targets in killing over 1,400 Palestinians (of which at least 850 were civilians, including 300 children and 110 women) and wounding over 5,000, and in destroying over 3,000 homes, damaging a further 11,000 and destroying or damaging hospitals, mosques, schools, factories, businesses, UN properties and government buildings.

On the basis of these facts and information collected in Gaza the IFFC found that the IDF had committed four separate war crimes:

  • Indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks on civilians;
  • Killing, wounding and terrorizing civilians;
  • Wanton destruction of property not justifiable on grounds of military necessity; and
  • Attacks on hospitals and ambulances and obstruction of the evacuation of the wounded.

The IFFC also found that the IDF had committed crimes against humanity in that it had committed acts of murder, persecution and inhumane acts as part of a widespread and systematic attack on a civilian population.

The IFFC examined the firing of rockets by Palestinian militants from Gaza during the conflict, which had caused the death of four Israeli civilians and wounded 182, and traumatized the population of Southern Israel . It found that the evidence showed that these militants were responsible for the commission of the war crimes of indiscriminate attacks on civilians; and the killing, wounding and terrorization of civilians.

The weaponry used by the IDF in Operation Cast Lead was examined by the IFFC, which found that Israel had used white phosphorus in violation of international law by using it as an incendiary weapon in densely populated neighbourhoods.

The IFCC considered the internal investigation conducted by the IDF which found that that the IDF had acted in accordance with the requirements of international law in the course of Operation Cast Lead . It rejected the conclusions of this investigation on the grounds that it was not an independent investigation, that it failed to consider most of the allegations made against the IDF and that it had not had regard to Palestinian sources. While the IFFC was prepared to accept that some buildings destroyed had been used to store munitions and that the Palestinians had on occasion used civilians as human shields, this could not explain or justify the heavy loss of life and injury and the massive destruction of property.

The IFCC considered the question whether the IDF had committed acts of genocide in the course of its offensive. Here it found that while IDF actions met some of the requirements for the crime of genocide, Israel lacked the necessary special intention to destroy in whole or in part a national or ethnical group as required by the Genocide Convention because its operation had been motivated by an intention to collectively punish the people of Gaza in order to compel the population to reject Hamas or subdue the population into a state of submission. The IFCC rejected Israel ’s claim that it had acted in self-defence as Israel ’s actions failed to satisfy either the legal or the factual requirements for this defence.

The IFCC made a number of recommendations to the LAS. It recommended that the LAS should:

  1. endorse the request of the Palestinian Authority that the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza be investigated and prosecuted by the International Criminal Court;
  2. request the Security Council of the United Nations to refer the situation in Gaza to the International Criminal Court as it had done in the case of Darfur with a view to prosecution of those responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity;
  3. request the General Assembly of the United Nations to ask for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the legal consequences of Operation Cast Lead; and
  4. recommend to states which recognize the principle of universal jurisdiction for international crimes that they prosecute Israeli political and military leaders for the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Goldstone’s UN inquiry team arrives in Gaza

BBC

1 June 2009

A UN team investigating possible war crimes in Gaza, led by Richard Goldstone, has arrived in the Strip on a week-long fact finding mission.

The four-member team entered from Egypt after Israel failed to grant visas, despite repeated requests by the UN.

The UN wants to investigate whether Israel and Hamas committed war crimes during Israel’s three-week operation in Gaza in December and January.

Israel accuses the UN branch carrying out the mission of bias against it.

The UN Human Rights Council has been accused of singling out Israel unfairly, and is viewed by some as having less credibility than other parts of the United Nations.

But correspondents say the selection of Mr Goldstone, a respected South African war crimes prosecutor who is also Jewish, as head of the inquiry has given it greater clout.

“They have been instructed to prove that Israel is guilty and we will not collaborate with such a masquerade,” foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor told AP news agency.

Public hearings

The team plans to meet “all concerned parties”, including non-governmental organisations, UN agencies and victims and witnesses of alleged violations of international humanitarian law, its office said in a statement.

Mr Goldstone has previously said his team had hoped to visit southern Israeli towns which have suffered Palestinian rocket fire , before entering Gaza from Israel, but Israel has shown no sign of allowing access.

Israel was initially angered that the team was tasked only with investigating alleged Israeli violations, but after Mr Goldstone was appointed, its mandate was widened to cover the activities of Palestinian militants too.

Inquiry conclusions

Several investigations into alleged violations of international law during Israel’s 22-day operation in Gaza, which ended on 18 January, have now reported back.

Israeli bombardment of Gaza, 14 January 2009
Israel has been accused of war crimes for air raids in heavily populated areas

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon has requested more than $11m (£7m) compensation from Israel for damage to UN property in Gaza, after a limited UN inquiry accused Israel of targeting known civilian shelters and providing untrue statements to justify actions in which civilians were killed.

The report found Israel to blame in six out of nine incidents when death or injury were caused to people sheltering at UN property and UN buildings were damaged.

The Israeli military has concluded in an internal investigation that its troops fought lawfully, although errors did take place, such as the deaths of 21 people in a wrongly targeted house.

Meanwhile, a fact-finding team commissioned by the Arab League said there was sufficient evidence for the Israeli military to be prosecuted for war crimes and crimes against humanity, and that “the Israeli political leadership was also responsible for such crimes”.

It also said Palestinian militants were guilty of war crimes in their use of indiscriminate attacks on civilians.

Palestinian rights groups say more than 1,400 Palestinians were killed during the January conflict. Israel puts the figure at 1,166.

Israeli and Palestinian estimates also differ on the numbers of civilian casualties.

Ten Israeli soldiers were killed, including four by friendly fire, and three Israel civilians died in rocket attacks by Palestinian militants.

Settlements continue to expand in Hebron

25 May 2009

North of Hebron, in a Palestinian village named Al Bueire, settlers had built an outpost over one and a half months ago. When Israeli forces finally removed the illegal outpost on 25 May 2009, settlers coordinated attacks on the Palestinian residents.

Around 4pm, settlers began to throw stones at the house of the Palestinian resident who owns the land upon which the outpost was built. Several Israeli solidarity activists were present at the scene and pressured the Israeli army and border police to prevent another attack from the settlers.

During the night on 25 May 2009, a road which leads to the village was blocked by settlers with big rocks. However, the Palestinian residents were able to remove the rocks in the morning. Additionally, settlers hoisted Israeli flags at the site of the outpost.

26 May 2009

At 10am on Tuesday, 26 May 2009, settlers from Karmel settlement came unto remaining land from Umm Al Kher with bulldozers to clear the Palestinian land. The inhabitants of Umm Al Kher tried to go out to prevent the settlers, but were stopped by Israeli border police.

In an hour, some 20 residents alongside an UNRWA official who happened to be in the area went to the land. Shortly thereafter, the Israeli occupation forces declared the area a Closed Military Zone and forced the Palestinians away.

Settlers from Karmel are continously trying to expand their illegal settlement with structures to de-facto annex Palestinian land. Residents from Umm Al Kher are frequently harassed by settlers and are not allowed to build new homes, connect to an electrical circuit or connect to a water system.

Ni’lin demonstrates against construction of the Apartheid Wall

29 May 2009

Palestinian residents, alongside international and Israeli solidarity activists, gathered to protest construction of the Apartheid Wall in Ni’lin on Friday, 29 May 2009 at 12:30pm. After a prayer on their land, residents and activists marched towards the construction site chanting slogans against the Occupation. Demonstrators were able to reach the Wall and spent most of the demonstration in their olive groves.

Upon reaching the barbed wire that separates Ni’lin from much of their remaining farmland, Palestinian demonstrators cut the wire. In both a symbolic and practical manner, Ni’lin residents sought to reclaim the land that was stolen from them for construction of the Apartheid Wall. According to the 2004 ruling given by the International Court of Justice, the Apartheid Wall is illegal.

After protesters arrived at the site of the Apartheid Wall, Israeli forces began to throw and shoot tear-gas canisters. For several hours, demonstrators remained near the barbed wire despite ongoing shooting from Israeli forces. The army fired tear-gas grenades from a gun, tear-gas canisters and used a machine that discharges 36 tear-gas canisters at once. In response to the army’s violence, some demonstrators threw stones at the army’s jeeps. Several demonstrators required medical attention after being heavily bombarded by tear-gas. Additionally, Israeli forces used 0.22 caliber live ammunition against the protesters.

After leaving the olive groves, demonstrators marched towards the entrance of the village where soldiers are often stationed on Fridays. Several demonstrators threw stones towards the soldiers. Israeli forces fired tear-gas canisters and rubber coated steel bullets into the main street at protesters, hitting one demonstrator with a rubber coated steel bullet just below his eye. The demonstration finished around 4:30pm.

Israeli occupation forces have murdered four Ni’lin residents during demonstrations against the confiscation of their land and critically injured one international solidarity activist.

Ahmed Mousa (10) was shot in the forehead with live ammunition on 29 July 2008. The following day, Yousef Amira (17) was shot twice with rubber-coated steel bullets, leaving him brain dead. He died a week later on 4 August 2008. Arafat Rateb Khawaje (22), was the third Ni’lin resident to be killed by Israeli forces. He was shot in the back with live ammunition on 28 December 2008. That same day, Mohammed Khawaje (20), was shot in the head with live ammunition, leaving him brain dead. He died three days in a Ramallah hospital. Tristan Anderson (37), an American citizen, was shot with a high velocity tear gas projectile on 13 March 2009 and is currently in critical condition. In total, 30 persons have been shot by Israeli forces with live ammunition.

Since May 2008, residents of Ni’lin village have been demonstrating against construction of the Apartheid Wall. Despite being deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice in 2004, the occupation continues to build a Wall, further annexing Palestinian land.

Ni’lin will lose approximately 2500 dunums of agricultural land when the construction of the Wall is completed. Ni’lin consisted of 57,000 dunums in 1948, reduced to 33,000 dunums in 1967, currently is 10,000 dunums and will be 7,500 dunums after construction of the Wall.

How ‘the busy one’ ekes out a living from the devastation of Gaza

Peter Beaumont | The Guardian

Mahmoud Mohammed Imad in front of his curtain made of garbage in Jabaliya refugee camp east of Gaza City. Photograph: Antonio Olmos
Mahmoud Mohammed Imad in front of his curtain made of garbage in Jabaliya refugee camp east of Gaza City. Photograph: Antonio Olmos

31 May 2009

Mahmoud Mohammed Imad sits in front of his curtain made of rubbish. The opening to his shop in the Jabaliya refugee camp could be a work of art. A single black army boot hangs threaded through its eyes. It dangles among coils of plastic pipe, skeins of used string, a football boot, the wheel of a child’s scooter. Disconnected electrical fittings are strung like beads. Shoes and more shoes. Fragments of the discarded and the broken.

It is a suspended, frozen waterfall of junk that partially conceals the room that lies behind it, a place piled high with unruly heaps of clothes that threaten to fall through the door and out on to the street.

In front of Imad are wooden sticks, stretchers for the kites the children make to fly or sell for a few shekels.

Imad is missing an eye. A young man in the street in a striped shirt – who describes Imad as a local legend – says that he lost it in the first intifada, in which his son also died. Nonsense, Imad says, when I ask him later. He lost his eye as an infant. “A woman told my mother I was a beautiful baby. Then two weeks later something went wrong.”

The camp’s residents call Imad the “busy one” and say the street is named after him. The loud guffawing men, and the gang of boys who crowd around him, speak over Imad, mocking him. One in particular, a neighbouring shopkeeper in a blue shirt, elects to speak on his behalf, and pushes Imad roughly from time to time to punctuate his points until finally the “busy one” explodes in anger.

Imad says more quietly that he is afraid the boys will try to steal his stuff, so one of the men threatens them with a piece of hose to drive them away. But still they laugh at him.

There are things in Imad’s tapestry of wreckage, he says, that were rescued from houses damaged in Israel’s assault in Gaza at the year’s beginning. But mostly the “busy one” buys his stuff from the Fras market in the centre of Gaza City, he says, bits and pieces for those who cannot afford to buy new things from the shops in a place where inflation is rampant and unemployment high.

Imad lists his prices: 15 shekels for the army boot; one shekel for the scooter wheel; six shekels for a piece of plastic pipe.

I head to the Fras junk market the following morning but find it was moved two months ago on the orders of Hamas from the street it once occupied in the city centre to a patch of sandy ground in the Yarmouk district next to a rubbish dump. As the horse carts drop off the waste, rag pickers scour the piles for things to salvage.

None of the traders like their new location much. There was a better passing trade, they say, in Fras than here where no shops exist.

On tables and sheets laid on the ground are rusty pickaxe handles, gas burner rings for stoves.

Mohammed Ahmed’s stall sells broken Moulinex food mixers, falafel makers and pieces for meat grinders. One of his mixers has a hole exposing the motor within, coiled with copper wire, damaged during the war. Some of the items on his stall were sold to him by people who lost their homes, but most of his stock – like the majority of things being sold at market – came originally from Israel before the border closed after Hamas assumed full power in 2007.

The goods made it into Gaza by that peculiar osmotic flow that occurs between the wealthy, powerful state and the impoverished entity – not even a country – where broken parts can be cannibalised, reinvented, resurrected.

Now even Israel’s junk cannot enter a Strip under economic siege. So what cannot be procured through the tunnels from Egypt, or cannot be afforded, is fixed and recycled.

It is a wearying process of constant attention where parts must be hunted for with vigour. One day the Daewoo car belonging to a friend’s husband starts bleeding oil. He searches the shops and workshops for a day for something that will fix it – until another part, in the wheel this time, breaks the following day and the whole business must be repeated.

Nothing that can be recovered and reused is discarded.

I run into Abdullah Ijnad working among the ruins of a mosque that has been moved by bulldozer from where it was blown up in northern Gaza by Israeli soldiers in January to a place where the concrete can be dismantled for its metal strengthening rods without offending its former worshippers.

Two amputated columns lie together in the rubble out of which Ijnad has already beaten out the metal with a sledgehammer. Now he pulls out the twisted corkscrews, warped by his hammering, to place them in a pile. The work is not yet finished.

Across the road Ijnad’s employer, Awni Sultan, 47, has set up a powerful hand-operated vice to straighten each individual rod, squeezing and bending out the kinks until they seem like new. Heavy. Arrow straight.

I am reminded of a story I heard earlier that day about the furniture shops performing the same renewal, growing wealthy in a place where new furniture is nowhere to be found. Taking old furniture, re-upholstering it, repairing the legs and selling it as newly made. And so Gaza recycles by necessity. Making and mending. Becoming the “busy one” as it survives.

Peter Beaumont is a senior foreign correspondent for the Observer and author of The Secret Life Of War