Haaretz: Despite Supreme court order, The IDF is not dismantling the fence near Bil’in

By Akiva Eldar, Haaretz Correspondent

Eight months after the High Court of Justice ordered the state to dismantle the segment of the separation fence near the Palestinian village of Bil’in within “a reasonable amount of time,” the Defense Ministry has yet to do so. It has not even begun to plan an alternative route there, in accordance with the court’s instruction.

These steps are not included in the Defense Ministry’s work plan for 2008. A spokesman for the ministry, Shlomo Dror, said Wednesday that the omission stems from budget constraints, and said he hoped that planning the alternative route would be included in the work plan for 2009 – in other words, a year and a quarter after the High Court ruling, at the very least.

In September 2007, the High Court ruled that a 1,700-meter segment of the separation fence near Bil’in must be dismantled and moved to an alternative route. The court said Israel built the segment in question on land appropriated from Palestinians, falsely citing security needs when the main objective was to enable the expansion of a nearby settlement, Modi’in Ilit (Kiryat Sefer). Furthermore, the justices ruled that the current route is topographically inferior, which endangers the security forces that patrol the area.

The justices, presided over by Supreme Court President Dorit Beinisch, ruled that the current route was planned in order to include part of Modi’in Ilit’s planned neighborhood of Matityahu East on the Israeli side. Therefore, the justices said the alternative route must be set without taking into account the settlement’s development plans.

Despite this, contractors recently began to lay the groundwork for building the eastern part of the neighborhood, on land the High Court ruled should be east of the fence.

The fence route currently cuts through 260 dunams of Bil’in lands, and traps another 1,600 dunams between the fence and the Green Line. For the past few years the fence in this area has been the focus of demonstrations by Bil’in residents and left-wing activists from Israel and abroad, who protest the difficulties it creates for Palestinians. There have frequently been clashes between demonstrators and security forces, sometimes resulting in injuries on both sides.

The villagers’ lawyer, Michael Sfard, is threatening legal action against the defense minister and commander of the Israel Defense Forces in the West Bank for failing to act on the matter. In a letter to Deputy Attorney General Mike Blass several days ago, Sfard said he will sue them for contempt of court unless he receives an explanation for the delay in planning the alternative route by the end of this week. He demanded that the Defense Ministry present this very month a new route that meets the High Court’s criteria.

“It is hard to shake the impression … that the respondents [the Israeli authorities A.E.] chose to outsmart the High Court of Justice ruling and to hold up the proceedings until the changes on the ground make its implementation impossible,” Sfard wrote in reference to the delay in planning the new route and the construction work in Matityahu East. He added that Bil’in residents and farmers “continue to go through hell to reach their lands, which are supposed to be, according to the High Court ruling, on ‘their’ side of the fence.”

Israel has not altered the route of the separation fence at three other places in the West Bank where the High Court of Justice has ordered it to do so: in the Alfei Menashe region, in Tzofin (Azoun), and Hashmonaim (Na’alin). The Justice Ministry said that due to the Passover holiday, the officials involved could not be reached for comment.

Haaretz: IDF – “Reuters reporter risked his life by going to Bil’in”

Original article published in Haaretz on the 19th April 2008, to see click here

The Israel Defense Forces spokesman on Friday said the Reuters writer who was lightly to moderately wounded by IDF fire near the West Bank separation fence in Bil’in put his life in danger by going to the area.

“It upsets us when photographers are hurt, but it should be noted that a photographer or any other civilian that enters a violent, closed military area is putting himself in danger of serious harm,” the IDF spokesperson’s statement read.

The statement also said that “today in the afternoon, around five Israeli civilians came to this area, along with foreigners and Palestinians, with the goal of damaging the fence and harming security personnel. These constitute dangerous, illegal disturbances that require IDF commanders establish a closed military area in the vicinity, and to use the means necessary to prevent an attack on soldiers, border patrolmen and the fence.”

The statement also accused demonstrators of using photographers as “human shields”, and said that some photographers actively encourage disturbances at the demonstrations.

“Today our forces used methods to disrupt the demonstrations that required the use of discriminatory and cautionary force,” the statement read, adding that the IDF will pursue “all means necessary to prevent damage to the fence, whose purpose is to prevent the carrying out of terrorist attacks on Israel.”

On Wednesday, a Palestinian cameraman working for Reuters was killed in the Gaza Strip when he was hit by a Flechette shell fired from an Israel Defense Forces tank, prompting the human rights group B’Tselem to reiterate their demand to discontinue the use of this fatal type of munition.

Fadel Shana, 23, was working for the news agency Reuters filming Israeli tanks when he was killed. Two other Palestinian civilians were also killed in the same incident

IMEMC: Palestinians Prisoners day: 9750 Palestinians are imprisoned by Israel

Original article published by IMEMC, 17th April 2008, click here

As Palestinians marked the Prisoners National Day on Thursday, official records showed that Israel still holds 9750 Palestinian political detainees.

Since 1967, when Israel occupied the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, Israeli troops have taken a total of 750, 000 Palestinian political detainees, the equivalent to all Palestinians families having had one of their sons imprisoned once or twice.

In a report issued by the Palestinian Authority, ‘Political Detainees in the Israeli Affairs Ministry’: from those 9750 prisoners 8030 are from the West Bank, 920 from the Gaza Strip, while the remaining 800 are from Jerusalem: Palestinians with Israeli citizenship and from several Arab countries.

49 of those kidnapped by the Israelis are Palestinian law makers who won the January 2006 Parliamentary elections.

Of the 9750 Prisoners recorded, 9230 were abducted by the Israeli army since year 2000, 350 were kidnapped before the Israeli Palestinian Peace deal of 1994, and 170 Prisoners were taken by the Israeli army between the years of 1994 to 2000.

According to the report, 4505 (46.2%) were sent to court, 4145 (42.5%) were detained without a trial, 1100 (11.3%) were kept under administrative detention, held without charges or court.

The recent numbers show that the Israelis have stepped up its policy of kidnapping Palestinians, they have kidnapped 2200 Palestinians since the beginning of year 2008,while from the same period of time in 2007 it was 1900, a 16% increase.

The Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli jails currently include 330 children and reports by the Red Cross and human right groups say they are being treated like adults: in addition during the interrogation by the army, 99% of them were tortured.

Four female prisoners had delivered their babies inside the detention camp.

The Israelis also used the police of administrative destination not only against the live Palestinians but the dead ones as well. The Palestinian Authority report showed that they still hold at least 200 bodies of Palestinians who conducted attacks against Israeli targets and refuse to send them back to their families, which is in violation of the international human right law.

The Guardian: Area C strikes fear into the heart of Palestinians as homes are destroyed

By Rory McCarthy

Original article published in The Guardian on 15th April 2008, click here

In the end it came down to a single-page letter, written in Hebrew and Arabic and hand-delivered by an Israeli army officer who knocked at the front door. The letter spelt the imminent destruction of the whitewashed three-storey home and small, tree-lined garden that Bassam Suleiman spent so long saving for and then built with his family a decade ago.

It was a final demolition order, with instructions to evacuate the house within three days.

If Suleiman was in any doubt about the Israeli military’s intentions he had only to look outside his back door where large piles of rubble and broken concrete mark the remains of the seven of his neighbours’ houses that were demolished in the same way last year.

“How would you feel when you’ve spent 20 years finishing your life’s project?” said Suleiman, 38, a teacher. He began moving his furniture out after the letter, from the civil administration of Judea and Samaria, the defence ministry department responsible for the Israeli-occupied West Bank, came on January 31. Now there are just a couple of plastic chairs in his front room and in the hallway the carpets are rolled up and ready to be moved. Clothes are piled on the floor and the shelves are empty, save for a stack of documents charting the story of the impending demolition. His brother, Husam, has already left the ground floor flat but the new washing machine and fridge stand still wrapped in plastic. Suleiman, his wife and two children wait for the bulldozers.

“Everything I did in my life was for what’s now inside this house and now it’s going to be destroyed,” said Suleiman. “It’s very hard for me to find somewhere else to live.”

The Israeli authorities argue that Suleiman’s house was built in a part of the West Bank known as area C, a designation from the era of the Oslo Accords which means Israel has full military and administrative control. In order to build, a Palestinian must apply for a permit from the Israeli authorities. If there is no permit – as in Suleiman’s case – the building is liable for demolition.

Area C covers 60% of the West Bank, home to around 70,000 Palestinians. It is also the area in which most Jewish settlements, all illegal under international law, are built. Compelling statistical evidence shows that while it is extremely hard for Palestinians to obtain building permits, settlements continue to grow rapidly.

Research by the Israeli group Peace Now found that 94% of Palestinian permit applications for Area C building were refused between 2000 and September 2007. Only 91 permits were granted to Palestinians, but 18,472 housing units were built in Jewish settlements. As a result of demolition orders 1,663 Palestinian buildings were demolished, against only 199 in the settlements. “The denial of permits for Palestinians on such a large scale raises the fear that there is a specific policy by the authorities to encourage a ‘silent transfer’ of the Palestinian population from area C,” Peace Now said.

This year there has been a marked increase in demolitions. There were 138 demolitions between January and March, most in area C, compared with 29 in the last three months of 2007, according to the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs. This year 400 Palestinians have been displaced as a result. At a time of a renewed peace process to create an independent Palestinian state, the reality in the West Bank is that Jewish settlements are growing and demolitions of Palestinian homes are on the increase.

The problems of the village of Far’un, south of Tulkarm, are complicated by the vast West Bank barrier, which here runs away from the 1949 ceasefire line that divides Israel and the Palestinian territories. The wide, steel fence, which passes just a few dozen metres from Suleiman’s home, cuts off the village from a slice of its agricultural land and underground water reserves and has turned this area into a dangerous no-go zone: in December 2006, a 14-year-old Palestinian girl playing nearby was shot dead by an Israeli soldier.

Suleiman’s house and that of his neighbour Emad Hassahsi, which has also received a demolition order, were built before the barrier arrived, in an area they were told – and they have letters that appear to support their claim – was area B, in which Palestinians have administrative control and therefore somewhere they thought they could safely build. Only later did the Israeli military announce it was in fact area C. There are similar disputes about the exact delineation of the different areas elsewhere the West Bank.

Israel’s civil administration offered no explanation for the rise in demolitions but told the Guardian: “The procedures that are carried out before the materialisation of a demolition order include: issuance of an order to cease building that is usually issued in the early stages of the construction of foundations; numerous deliberations at the high planning and zoning committee and of course an open door to the supreme court of justice. These procedures are valid for both Palestinians and Israelis alike.” It said the buildings demolished in Far’un were “built illegally without the required licences”.

One effect of the strict planning curbs is to limit the growth of Palestinian villages. “If you look at the way the Israelis are enforcing planning and construction regulations you see they are being enforced in a one-sided way,” said Avi Berg, research director of the leading Israeli human rights group B’Tselem, which has worked on the Far’un case.

Settlement growth continues apace despite the fact that the current peace talks are based on the US Road Map, under which Israel is required to freeze settlement activity. In another report, Peace Now said that since the talks began at Annapolis last November, Israel was still building 500 homes in West Bank settlements and had issued tenders for 750 homes in East Jerusalem settlements. Reports suggest another 1,400 homes will be built in two settlements in East Jerusalem and in the West Bank.

The Israeli government defends the continued settlement construction particularly in the major settlements which it calls “population centres”, saying it will not build new settlements or expropriate more land. “In the population centres and in Jerusalem the reality on the ground will not be the same in the future as it is today,” Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert said last month. “There will be more additional building as part of the reality of life and this is something that was explained …”

Not all the cases of demolition involve homes. In January, Israeli forces uprooted 3,200 trees, destroyed water cisterns and stone terraces in fields near Beit Ula, close to Hebron, in the southern West Bank. Again this was in area C. The civil administration said the demolition was an “enforcement activity” carried out after legal warnings.

But in this case the target was a €64,000 (£51,000) project from the European commission which began two years ago to provide a livelihood for the villagers, several of whom also put their own money into the planting.

“It was a tragedy for us,” said Sami al-Adam, 46, a farmer who had put in 45,000 shekels. “They’re tearing me out by my roots. They want to destroy Palestinian farmers psychologically and economically.”

ICAHD: Video of Prof. Jeff Halper being detained while attempting to prevent house being demolished

Original Ma’an report (click here)
Israeli police arrested Jeff Halper, the founder and coordinator of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (ICAHD) for attempting to prevent the destruction of a Palestinian house in the town of Anata, within the municipal boundaries of Jerusalem, on Wednesday morning.

He was detained at the Metsudat Adumim police headquarters for two hours before being released. He has not yet been charged with any criminal offence but has been told he may face criminal proceedings.

“It’s not clear if they’re going to press charges,” Halper told Ma’an after his release, adding that he may be facing a jail sentence if charged. “I’ve run out of hours of community service so they’ll have to put me in jail but I doubt that it’ll happen.”

Israeli police removed the furniture from the Hamdan family home in Anata before Israeli bulldozers moved in and leveled the house, an ICAHD spokesperson said.

Meir Margalit, ICAHD field coordinator, appealed to a Jerusalem municipal court on Wednesday for a stop demolition order. The appeal was rejected, ICAHD said.

The house that was home to 12 members of the Hamdan family, had been previously demolished in December 2005, and was rebuilt by international volunteers last summer as an act of civil disobedience against the policy of house demolitions.

“Ending house demolitions is in the first phase of the Road Map. This [house demolitions] is just spitting in the face of the Quartet. We’re supposed to believe there’s a peace process but the occupation are doing everything they can on the ground – building the separation wall, building settler roads and house demolitions,” Halper said.

“The peace process is a sham. Israel doesn’t even pretend they are not doing any of these things. This shows the whole impotence of the peace process,” he added.

ICAHD says that 88% of land in Jerusalem is not zoned for Palestinian construction. As a result, building permits are nearly impossible to obtain, and houses are routinely demolished on this pretext.

28 homes have been demolished in Jerusalem since the beginning of 2008, ICAHD says.