Hebron Settlers Vandalise Palestinian School

by Joe

June 22nd: Shortly after 4:00 p.m. this afternoon, a Palestinian youth informed two human rights workers sitting on Shuhada St. that settler youth were attacking the retaining wall just built alongside the new brick path to the Qurtuba School. When we reached the staircase up to the path, we saw three settler boys, aged approximately 10-12, on the path. When they saw us and our video camera, they immediately ran from the scene and crossed back to the Beit Hadassah settlement.

The settler boys had apparently used one large boulder and several bricks to smash some of the breeze-blocks the new wall is made of. In all, they damaged 26 of the 95 blocks that make up the top row of the retaining wall, which is part of an improvement program funded by the international monitoring group TIPH (Temporary International Presence in Hebron). They almost totally destroyed some of the blocks, but did not get to the second layer of blocks. If human rights workers had not been stationed nearby, the damage would undoubtedly have been much worse.

The human rights workers video-taped the damage and called the police, the army office, and TIPH to report the incident. A police jeep arrived 5-10 minutes later, but the police officers refused to get out of their vehicle to survey the damage or to talk to the settlers. TIPH promised to send one of its monitoring teams to inspect the damage to the project it is financing, but as of 6:40 p.m. the team had not arrived.

At around 6 p.m. one of three Palestinian youth talking with a human rights worker on the path was hit in the arm and cut by a sharp stone thrown by a settler boy hiding behind a car parked in front of the settlement.

More photos of the destruction can be seen at:
Settlers Attack

Video: Israeli soldier refuses to intervene as settlers stone human rights workers


To download the video click here

June 14th: At approximately 12:30 PM, two Human Rights Workers (HRWs) on Shuhada Street noticed a group of between 8 and 10 settlers boys between the ages of 9 and 12 carrying plastic bags filled with water. The boys were coming out of the Beit Hadassah settlement and were headed up the stone stairs towards Qurtoba, a Palestinian school building. The HRWs followed the boys to the stairs and were attacked with the bags of water. The soldier on duty at the Israeli military post spoke to the HRWs in Hebrew and made gestures for them to leave. The HRWs told the soldiers they only spoke English and asked him to get the kids to stop attacking them. The soldier did nothing and the children began throwing rocks at the HRW.

To read the full report please click here.

Denied Entry

by Noura Khouri

Typically, entry to the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) through the only possible route available, via Israel, is a nerve- racking, tiresome and extremely invasive affair. If the foreigner in question answers honestly, to the barrage of questions hurled by the Israeli Border Police he or she could be in for a very stressful and unpleasant entry process. Unbearably long delays, grueling interrogations, strip searches and basic humiliation are amongst the best case scenarios, notwithstanding the ever increasing threat of deportation. As a result, one is forced to lie with the coolness of a professional criminal and be prepared to back up their story, corroborated by witnesses, contact names and phone numbers in order to enter the OPT.

Because this policy has gone completley unquestioned, Israel has recently, contrary to international law, launched an actual systematic campaign to get and keep foreign nationals out of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. By avoiding negotiations with the Palestinians and imposing ongoing unilateral steps, Israel grows ever closer to implementing their agenda, without any resistance by the international community, or the UN.

It is a relatively known fact that many Palestinian-Americans and other foreign nationals would love to be “allowed” to live in the Palestinian territories. Yet, it is forbidden, by Israel, for foreigners to reside in the OPT. So typically the main way for foreigners to stay for an extended period of time is to renew the three month Israeli visitor visa. However, it seems the [Israeli] State is catching on to these practices. Al-Jazeera recently estimated “that at least 13,000 people (non-Jews) have been arbitrarily denied entry to Israel/Palestine.” They have been stopped from entering Israel, en route to Palestine, or re-entering, after leaving the country for their required 3-month visa renewal.

Israel ultimately decides, at whim, who gets in and who does not of the OPT. Those who are denied entry typically are those who have Palestinian background, children and/or that are married to someone with Palestinian ID, human rights activists and NGO employees. To summarize: those who are not a security risk of any kind, but who just happen to disagree with Israel policies in the OPT and act as witnesses, have the highest risk of deportation.

Illegal Discrimination Policies Upon consulting with Israeli lawyers, it seems that at present there is still no official written legislation or policy that backs up this escalating practice. Israel’s long term practice of unilateral measures often avoids issuing public statements, when knowing that these criteria are far from kosher from a legal perspective. The basis in illegality lies in international law, namely the UN Security Council’s Resolution 242, which demands that Israel withdraw from the Occupied Territories. Thus, fundamentally, the Israeli State, has no legal basis in international law to control all of the borders, nor to deny permission for Palestinians to build an airport in Gaza and the West Bank. The principle of non discrimination in article 5 of ICERD obligates “States Parties to the Convention to guarantee to everyone, without distinction as to race, colour, national or ethnic origin, equality before the law, notably in the enjoyment of certain civil, political, economic, and social rights.” If it is just for security, those in question have the right to know what the entry criteria are; not least to ensure that those criteria are non-discriminatory and legal. Furthermore, “The principle of non-discrimination is non-derogable; even when war or a state of emergency exists, a state may not engage in acts that amount to racial discrimination.”

The denial of entry by Israel to foreign nationals into Palestinian territory is yet another means by which to deny Palestinian basic rights and sovereignty. Should it not be the Palestinians themselves who decide who they want to allow into their territory or not? Along with U.S. and U.N. acquiescence to settlement expansion, land and water theft, complete control of movement in the OPT, systematic denial of entry seems to be Israel’s way of locking the door and throwing away the prison key, towards achieving their political aim of Palestinian Bantustans, controlled by the State, in lieu of a sovereign viable state. The removal of foreign nationals as human rights observers acting as outside witnesses and as a deterrent to regular Israeli war crimes [helps this ‘system’ work – E.].

Case in point, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) offers a program called TOKTEN (Transfer of Knowledge Through ExpatriateNationals) program. The UN’s TOKTEN program aims to reverse patterns of brain drain by encouraging expatriate nationals, who have an expertise in a certain field to live and work in their home country. In the past, TOKTEN employees were provided visas through the UN to work for a Palestinian organization. The program allowed many individuals the mutual benefit of transferring a specific skill-based knowledge and helping rebuild their ancestral country, while living in their homeland. However, in a meeting recently held by the UNDP, [it emerges that] those currently holding a TOKTEN visa are enjoying an interim grace period and are unlikely to be granted future visas, because Israel is no longer granting permission for the UN to do so. This appears as the first visible sign of official policy to further isolate, marginalize, and imprison the Palestinian people from the rest of the world.

This UNDP announcement also prevents foreign nationals who are currently living and working in the West Bank from being allowed to live in there any longer. They are now being required to move to Jerusalem, even though the daily grind of the checkpoints makes it incredibly tiresome and unrealistic to sustain the journey day in and day out, on a long term basis. In addition, they will be required to get weekly permission, by Israel, to be allowed into the West Bank. Those who are “caught” living in the West Bank will be forcibly removed from not only the OPT, but their visa will be revoked and they will be deported within a day’s notice, which has already happened in at least one case.

What are the countries of the nationals in question doing to ensure that the treatment and rights of their citizens are being upheld? Nothing as far as the eye can see. In fact, not only are the US and UN complying with the State’s control over the Palestinian territories, even Sweden has recently issued a statement to the effect that “entry into the territories under the control of the P.A., in the Gaza Strip, Judea, and Samaria (Area A) is forbidden without the attainment of prior written authorization. Entry into the aforementioned territories, without prior authorization, may result in legal measures being taken against you, including deportation and refusal of future re-entry into the State of Israel.” This statute implies that the self-regulated autonomous body called the P.A. can determine who enters their own territory. However, “the submission of a request to authorize entry into the above-mentioned areas does not constitute permission to do so, until written authorization has been received.”

This would misleadingly give one the impression that the PA in fact authorizes the `written authorization’; ironically, this is not the case. To summarize, you must apply for a separate visa to enter `areas under the control of the Palestinian Authority,’ however Israel has the only say in whether or not you will get permission to enter.

Yet, Jews or those who pretend to be Jewish from all over the world are encouraged and somehow have more of a right to not only visit, but live unconditionally as colonialist settlers, over indigenous Palestinian people. For example, according to the Tel Aviv University website, “Israel has visa agreements with 65 countries. Nationals of these countries do not need to obtain an entry permit or visa prior to their arrival in Israel; they automatically receive a B2 Tourist Visa, valid for three months, upon entering the country.” Additionally, the “A4 Student Family Visa” – Faculty and students can apply for this visa for their family members. It is valid for up to a year and must be renewed annually.” However, a visiting Professor at Birzeit University through the UN’s TOKTEN program is not even granted a requested three-month visa to finish out his term this semester because of Israel’s denial to grant the visa.

The Israeli rationale is for our own ‘security,’ of course, the ‘situation on the ground’ in the West Bank between Fateh and Hamas provides a reason for much stiffer entry regulations. Yet, according to International Law, “The principle of non- discrimination is non-derogable; even when war or a state of emergency exists, a state may not engage in acts that amount to racial discrimination:

(4) Accordingly, when a State faces a threat to its security, for example, it may not target members of a particular racial group for less favourable treatment than persons who do not belong to that group. Additionally, is it not the inalienable right of those who for years have been committed to living and working under the not exactly safe conditions of Occupation to make that decision for themselves?

It is a basic principle of international human rights law that human rights treaties apply to all areas over which a state party exercises effective control. It is well known and documented that Israel as an occupying power considers itself above international law. This however does not absolve it from its legal responsibilities. An occupying power has a responsibility to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention and protect the civilian population they are occupying. In the absence of a negotiated solution or handing over control, as agreed upon in the Oslo Accords, Israel has no legal right to deny people entry to the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), especially when entering from the Jordanian border.

As 3.5 million Palestinian people suffer, isolated and starved solely for their choice of a democratically elected government, the wall and settlements encroach, stealing more land and water; while Israel kills Palestinians with impunity. Is it not more critical than ever for Palestinian and international human rights observers to witness and document the situation on the ground? There is something we can do to resist these unjust, discriminatory policies. We can put pressure on our country’s government to exercise fair treatment and can demand action of the United Nations in enforcing Israeli compliance with International standards.

What you can do:

• Start a campaign in your country to contact your congress or
respective governments and demand that they put pressure on Israel and the UN to end the isolation of Palestinians now.

• Visit, or better yet, move to Palestine and get in while you still can.

• Boycott and Divest from Israel!

• Email: palsolidarity@palnet.com and let us know if you know of anyone who has been denied entry into Occupied Palestinian Territories.

• Or email the above address if you are interested in being a part of a campaign started by Palestinian human rights workers from Al- Haq and Birzeit University to help stop these illegal practices!

Israeli “Justice”: Paul Larudee Denied Entry to Palestine by Israel

UPDATE, 19th of June: Judge Pilpel yesterday ruled that Paul will be denied entry. Paul has now left the country. There are now 15 days to file an appeal against the denial of entry. At this time, a decison on whether to do this or not has not been made.

Israeli friends who came to attend the court hearing Thursday of Paul Larudee, Ph.D., a 60-year-old piano tuner from California, were shocked at how the so-called trial transpired. After opening statements from both the defence and prosecution lawyers, Judge Pilpel requested a private conference in the judge’s chambers with secret service agents who presented her with “secret evidence” explaining why Paul should be denied entry to Israel.

Paul’s denial of entrance to Israel means denying Paul access to the occupied Palestinian territories where he was planning to support Palestinian nonviolent resistance with the ISM (the International Solidarity Movement) and has twenty engagements scheduled for tuning pianos. Israel continues to control all the border crossings in and out of the West Bank plus the only border crossing for use of internationals in and out of Gaza. Israel has denied entry to thousands of peace activists in the past three years and completely denies foreign nationals the right to visit Gaza.

To the dismay of Paul’s attorney, Gaby Lasky, Judge Pilpel came back from her session with the secret service saying that she thinks that there is no reason to discuss the other points brought up in the defence. The reason for Paul’s detention was not questioned nor presented to the public. This kind of “trial” is common in Israel’s military legal system, through which thousands of Palestinians have been sentenced to renewable periods of “administrative detention” based on secret charges that are, in turn, based on secret evidence.

It is inevitable that democratic values in the Israeli civil legal system, such as an individual’s right to defend himself in court, have been eroded under such a system. Democratic values cannot co-exist in an apartheid system. The Israeli civil court system cannot respect human rights as long as there is a parallel military legal system in which the human rights of Palestinians are disregarded.

Paul has been held in detention since the 4th of June. Judge Pilpel will give her decision on Sun June 18th at 8:00 AM

From his holding cell, Dr. Larudee made this statement,

“Am I a security threat to Israel?”

“Numerous ISM volunteers have been denied entry, for no more than the infamous ‘secret security’ reasons that no one is allowed to see. Case closed.

“What could the mysterious security reasons for my detention be? Perhaps there are clues. Let’s assume that it has something to do with my participation in the International Solidarity Movement, which practices nonviolent resistance against Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights. First, let’s acknowledge that Israeli authorities are no fans of the ISM. We support Palestinian nonviolent resistance to the occupation on a regular basis. This may be against Israeli regulations, but that is the nature of nonviolent civil disobedience, and our actions have spared lives, both Israeli and Palestinian.

“Let me acknowledge that my treatment here is not onerous. The cells are as comfortable as one could reasonably expect in what is, in effect, a prison. The guards are courteous and make every effort to accommodate special needs. There are, however differences between my treatment and that of other detainees. I have been isolated from the rest of the population and am usually the only person in a single cell. Second, I am not permitted use of any mobile phone, while all others have this privilege. More than once, I have been told “not to talk to journalists.” Finally, I was not even permitted paper and pencil until a flood of calls and a visit from the US Consul managed to reverse that draconian condition. These restrictions point towards suppression of free speech and dissent as the real motivation, not security concerns.”

For more information, contact:

Neta Golan at the ISM Media Office: 02-297-1824
Attorney Gaby Lasky: 05444 18 988

Bil’in Unites in Solidarity With Gaza

By Sunbula and Jennie


Photos by Sunbula

Yet again, the people of Bil’in were joined in solidarity by international and Israeli peace activists on a Friday afternoon after midday prayers to protest the annexation of the village’s land by the illegal Apartheid Wall. The Israeli presence here is constant, and there is a camaraderie among the people here, sharing together a comfort that is almost surreal considering what we are about to face.

We gathered in front of the house where a few Internationals are staying, and made our way to the metal gate in front of the Wall where 2 hummers full of Israeli Border Police with guns and cameras were waiting. They knew to expect us and it was another Friday demo for those who participate weekly.
The theme of this Friday’s demonstration was the massacre on the Gaza sea shore where 7 members of the Ralia family were murdered by Israeli artillery fire. The demonstrators carried 7 mock open coffins to symbolize them and made a mock grave in front of the wall.

It was obvious today how the border police were there just to beat people. Everybody was committed to getting past the wall. We walked together down the road, and had a relatively quiet demo until the soldiers responded to a couple of stones thrown by the children. You have to understand that a stone, no matter how well thrown, is no match for the guns, sound bombs and tear gas which were the response from the soldiers. The mock graves were still successfully laid side by side next to the barrier.

A couple of people even managed to get amongst the Border Police jeeps and at times it seemed that they didn’t quite know what to do with such determined people. Nevertheless, they threw five or six sound bombs, one of which lightly injured Palestinian ISM activist Mohammad Mansour.

They also engaged in indiscriminate beating and shoving of protestors, including women and children, when they refused to move back.

A bunch of people responded by sitting down where they were and chanting. Some of them were forcibly picked up and manhandled by the soldiers.

A young man from the village received a rubber bullet in the side of his torso. As they have been doing in the past few weeks, after the protest was called off and people started to walk back to the village, the soldiers started firing tear gas cannisters at us. It seemed that they wanted to punish us for demonstrating, but an Israeli peace activist gave a more banal explanation: they need to expend all the tear gas earmarked in their budget for each demonstration otherwise it will appear later as if they weren’t doing their job properly! Overall though, the protest lasted longer and was a lot less violent than the protests of the past few Fridays.

I’ll quote what Mohammad said to me later: we are doing this for the Israeli children as much as for anyone else, so that they can play and swim together with our kids as one in the future, without thinking who is Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Arab or Israeli. It’s a simplistic thought but still a nice one to keep in the back of your mind when you’re here as an activist to remind yourself, in stressful situations, why you came here.