Boston Globe: “My Life in Gaza”

by Mona El-Farra, July 10, 2006

The irony is almost beyond belief. Since the capture of an Israeli soldier on June 25, the Gaza Strip has been subjected to a large-scale military operation, what Israel calls “Summer Rain.” Because Israel bombed the power plant, and the area needs electricity to pump water, most of Gaza now has almost no access to drinking water. In the heat of summer, rain would be a blessing far more welcome than the ongoing bombings.

I am already starting to lose track of days and nights, of how many bombs have dropped. Since the main power plant was destroyed, we have had to live with no electricity. What we do get is patchy, and barely enough to recharge our mobile phones and our laptops so that we do not lose all touch with each other and with the outside world.
As a physician, I fear for our patients. Twenty-two hospitals have no electricity. They have to rely on generators, but the generators need fuel. We have enough fuel to last a few days at most, because the borders are sealed so no fuel can get in. The shortage of power threatens the lives of patients on life-support machines and children in intensive care, as well as renal dialysis patients and others. Hundreds of operations have been postponed. The pharmacies were already nearly empty because of Israeli border closures and the cutoff of international aid. What little supplies were left have gone bad in the absence of refrigeration.

Food too is spoiling without refrigeration, and food supplies are low. West Bank farmers threw away truckloads of spoiled fruit after sitting for days and then being denied Israeli permission to enter Gaza. Children grow hungry as we watch the food that could nourish them thrown into the garbage instead. More than 30,000 children suffer from malnutrition, and this number will increase as diarrhea spreads because of the limited supply of clean water and food contamination.

As a mother, I fear for the children. I see the effects of the relentless sonic booms and artillery shelling on my 13-year-old daughter. She is restless, panicked, and afraid to go out, yet frustrated because she can’t see her friends. When Israeli fighter planes fly by day and night, the sound is terrifying. My daughter usually jumps into bed with me, shivering with fear. Then both of us end up crouching on the floor. My heart races, yet I try to pacify my daughter, to make her feel safe. But when the bombs sound, I flinch and scream. My daughter feels my fear and knows that we need to pacify each other. I am a doctor, a mature, middle-aged woman. But with the sonic booming, I become hysterical.

This aggression will leave psychological scars on the children for years to come. Instilling fear, anger and loss in them will not bring peace and security to Israelis.

Ostensibly, this bombing campaign started because of the soldier’s capture. To the outside world it might seem like an easy decision for Palestinians: Let the soldier go, and the siege will end. Yet for Gazans, even in the face of this brutal violence, another decision comes, not with ease, but with resolve. He is one soldier who was captured in a military operation. Today, several hundred Palestinian children and women are locked in Israeli prisons. They deserve their freedom no less than he does. Their families mourn their absence no less than his family does. So while Gazans endure Israel’s rainstorm, most want the soldier held — not harmed — until the women and children are released.

Most Gazans also believe that Israel’s latest assault was pre-planned, that the soldier’s capture is merely a trigger. Israel dropped thousands of shells on Gaza, killing women, children and old people, long before his capture. This time, Israel attacked Gaza within hours of a national consensus accord signed by Fatah and Hamas, which could have led to negotiations between Palestinians and Israelis. That would have pushed Israel to give up control of Palestinian land and resources. Gazans believe that the goal of Israel’s military campaign is the destruction of both our elected government and our infrastructure, and with it our will to secure our national rights.

Though we do not now live with ease, we live with resolve. Until the world pressures Israel to recognize our rights in our land, and to pursue a peace that brings freedom and security to Israelis and Palestinians, we both will continue to pay the price.

Mona El-Farra is a physician and human rights advocate in the Gaza Strip.

Ha’aretz: “Israel bars Palestinian Americans for first time since 1967”

by Amira Hass, Ha’aretz, 10th July 2006

For the first time since 1967, Israel is preventing the entry of Palestinians with foreign citizenship, most of them Americans.

Most of those refused entry are arriving from abroad, but have lived and worked for years in the West Bank.

The Interior Ministry and Civil Administration made no formal announcement about a policy change, leaving returnees to discover the situation when they reach the border crossings.
By various estimates, the ban has so far affected several thousand American and European nationals, whom Israel has kept from returning to their homes and jobs, or from visiting their families in the West Bank.

This could potentially impact many more thousands who live in the territories – including university instructors and researchers, employees working in various vital development programs and business owners – as well as thousands of foreign citizens who pay annual visits to relatives there. The policy also applies to foreigners who are not Palestinian but are married to Palestinians, and to visiting academics.

The first group to suffer are Palestinians born in the territories, whose residency Israel revoked after 1967 while they were working or studying abroad. Some eventually married residents of the territories, or returned to live with aging parents and siblings. Israel rejected their applications for “family reunification” (i.e., requests to have their residency restored). However, until recently Israel permitted them to continue living in the territories on tourist visas, renewable every three months by exiting and reentering the country. In some cases the State also granted them work permits.

Citizens of Arab states (whether or not of Palestinian origin) have been barred from entering Israel since 2000. A handful were allowed in as “exceptional humanitarian cases” – mostly when a first-degree relative is dying or has died – but even this practice was suspended in April.

One of the demands that Israel has posed in specific cases which attorney Leah Tsemel represented before the High Court of Justice, is that applications for visitation permits be authorized by a low-ranking official from the Palestinian Interior Ministry, who is not affiliated with Hamas. The ministry refuses to comply with this condition. Now it turns out that this policy has been extended to U.S. and European citizens.

An Israeli Interior Ministry spokesperson told Haaretz that this is not a new policy, but merely a “procedural updating.” But the High Court petitions department at the State Prosecutor’s Office, which has been addressing the phenomenon with regard to several specific petitions, wrote Tsemel on May 2, 2006 that a policy on entry of foreign nationals to the West Bank would be formulated only “at the start of next week.” Since then Tsemel has not learned whether such a policy was indeed drafted.

The U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv told Haaretz that no Israeli official informed them of a change in entry policy, and said that the United States cannot intervene in sovereign decisions of another country. Several people who were refused entry and spoke with U.S. representatives said that the consulate and embassy are well aware of the apparently new policy.

An e-mail from the department of U.S. Citizen Services in Jerusalem to a U.S. citizen who had inquired about entering the West Bank stated that the consul general had met with a representative from the Israeli Interior Ministry regarding the government’s entry policies: “The Israeli official conceded that 90-day visa entry cards, which were once routinely granted in the past, especially to U.S. citizens, are now more difficult to obtain, specifically for Palestinian American citizens traveling to the West Bank and for U.S. nationals affiliated with humanitarian organizations. Both the U.S. Embassy and the Consulate in Jerusalem are pursuing the issue.”

Israel’s Civil Administration stated in response that “the entry to the region of foreigners who are not residents of the territories takes place by means of visit permits issued by the Palestinian Authority and approved by the Israeli side,” because coordination stopped after September 2000, and entry was permitted in exceptional humanitarian cases – a practice that was also suspended after the Hamas government was formed. Today, the statement continued, cases “involving special humanitarian need” are being considered.

The Civil Administration confirmed that the applications must be conveyed by a low-ranking official who is unaffiliated with Hamas. The Interior Ministry and Civil Administration declined to comment on the fact that for 40 years, Palestinian citizens of Western countries did not required a”visitation permit.”

CUPE President: “Slurs will not silence us”

by Sid Ryan, [Canadian] Globe & Mail, July 7th

When our union recently passed a resolution critical of policies of the government of Israel, it was savagely attacked in several quarters and labelled by many as anti-Semitic.

When the Toronto Conference of the United Church of Canada, the largest Protestant church in the country, called for a limited boycott and divestment strategy toward Israel, it, too, faced a barrage of baseless allegations of anti-Semitism (though little was said about the two Jewish organizations, the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians and Jewish Women to End the Occupation, who joined in the church group’s action). Canadian media, with few exceptions, refuse to report on the plight of innocent Palestinians not involved in terrorist activities. They insist on focusing on the minority of Palestinians who inflict despicable violence on innocent civilians. The media refuse to address Israel’s violation of international law, the Geneva Conventions, the rulings of the International Court [of Justice] in The Hague and a number of United Nations resolutions. This lack of reporting leaves the Canadian population with a one-sided view. Israel’s recent bombing campaign and incursion in Gaza has destroyed schools and universities, demolished bridges and roads, and killed several Palestinians. The sonic-boom bombardments wreak havoc on a civilian population, smashing windows and doors and terrorizing children. More damaging, there is no electricity for more than 700,000 people — no lights, no refrigerators, and no fans in the suffocating heat. It means no clean water — the public water supply uses electricity — leading to disease, possibly cholera. It means limited services in hospitals and clinics dependant on electricity.

Were this Northern Ireland, the wrath of the international community would be swift and harsh. Yet when we criticize this behaviour, we are labelled anti-Semites — a convenient tactic used to shut down debate and silence us from any criticism of the state of Israel.

Even Switzerland, renowned for its neutrality, criticized Israel this week. “There is no doubt that Israel has not taken the precautions required of it in international law to protect the civilian population and infrastructure,” said a statement issued by the Swiss Foreign Ministry. The strongest condemnation for the irresponsible Gaza campaign came Tuesday from the editorial page of one of Israel’s most respected newspapers, Haaretz.

In an astonishing moment of frankness and brevity, the newspaper called for the permanent withdrawal of the Israeli Defence Forces from the occupied territories.

“The right always proposes the same recipe, but in ever-increasing doses: If we did not manage to deter them by using force, we need to use more force; and if that fails, then we need to use even more force. The establishment of the settlements was, and remains, a form of using force, as is construction of the fence along a route that harms Palestinian life more than necessary for security purposes,” the editorial stated. “The attempt to topple an elected government by means of tanks and to remove members of an elected parliament by arresting them also constitutes a policy of aggression.”

“At this time, it must be reiterated,” the newspaper said, “and it would be appropriate for the Prime Minister to find the time and the strength of will to do so — that Israel has no option in the long run other than withdrawing from the territories and from the occupation.” There you have it in a nutshell, the essence of CUPE Ontario’s resolution spoken from the pages of Israel’s influential newspaper. I now expect to hear B’nai Brith, the Canadian Jewish Congress and Simon Wiesenthal Centre, together with all their cronies, scream and hurl accusations of anti-Semitism at the editorial board of Haaretz. Or is that treatment is reserved for CUPE and the United Church?

Sid Ryan is president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (Ontario).

Links were added by the ISM Media Group.

International Outcry At Israel’s Broad Offensive in the Gaza Strip

July 8th: In response to the incursion in the Gaza Strip, many national and international organizations have condemned Israel’s violence. This release is intended to highlight some of the entities speaking out in support of the Palestinian people and in opposition to Israel’s unchecked aggression. Please visit the following sites to read more about the individual condemnations:

The European Union condemns the Gaza offensive:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5159050.stm
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3272507,00.html

The United Nations condemns the Gaza offensive:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5154594.stm
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=19108&Cr=middle&Cr1=east

The Swiss government condemns the Gaza offensive:
http://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/e/home/singlem.html?id=5978
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5145654.stm

The National Lawyers Guild (US) condemns the Gaza offensive:
http://www.nlg.org/news/statements/gaza0706.htm

A group of 300 British Jews condemn the Gaza offensive:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5154838.stm

In addition to the the above mentioned voices, a collection of 71 international and Palestinian social justice groups have co-signed a plea to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan asking the United Nations to take action to protect the residents of Gaza. The letter entitled, “Immediate International Protection for the Palestinian People in the Occupied Territory,” was addressed to the entire security council and called on the UN to take the following three actions:

1.) “Forming an international force to protect Palestinian lives against
violent attacks by the Israeli military.”
2.) “Calling for the immediate release of Palestinian prisoners held in violation of international law;.”
3.) Holding Israel accountable for its war crimes against the Palestinian people, its violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Right and the Convention Against Torture, and its blatant disregard for the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Following the capture of an Israeli soldier near the Gaza Strip thirteen days ago, Israel has launched a major offensive in Gaza killing over 40 Palestinians and decimating the infrastructure. The air strikes have destroyed bridges, power facilities, structures within the Islamic University, the office of the Prime Minister, the Interior Ministry, and countless civilian targets. In tandem with the constant air strikes by the Israeli airforce, Israeli ground forces have led an invasion into the north and south of Gaza. During this time, the Israeli military has arrested over eight hundred Palestinians, including democratically elected members of the Palestinian Legislative Council, and Palestinian civilians living in Israel.

Since the incursion began, Israel has modified its public rationale and objective; Israel now states that the offensive has expanded its focus from freeing its captured soldier to eliminating “institutions of terrorism.” Despite Israel’s new claims, many analysts have explained that the attacks and arrests are aimed at destabilizing the newly elected Palestinian government. It is beyond an abridgement of international law for Israel to attempt to undermine, by force, the democratically elected government of Palestine. Israel must allow the Palestinian people political self-determination and must abide by their choice of an elected government.

The International Solidarity Movement (ISM) joins these voices and strongly opposes the ongoing Israeli violence in the Gaza Strip. ISM activists will continue to support the Palestinian people on the ground, and remain committed to opposing occupation, violence and oppression at the hands of the Israeli military.

Haaretz: “Palestinians, leftists evacuated from disputed settlement edifice”

by Dan Keinan, Ha’aretz, 6th July

Border Police forces evacuated left-wing activists and three Palestinian families from the West Bank village of Bil’in who occupied a building Thursday in the Matityahu East neighborhood of the Jewish settlement of Upper Modi’in.

The squatters claim to possess documented proof that the property, which was built by Israeli contractor Heftsiba, and the land on which it is built is rightfully owned by Palestinians.

The High Court of Justice issued an injunction barring potential dwellers from entering the home while the question of rightful ownership is being deliberated in court.


Picture from Israeli Channel 2

Currently, 80 Jewish families live in Matityahu East, the neighborhood which continues to absorb additional Jewish families despite the injunction and with little interference from the authorities, the Palestinians say.

“This property, which is already within the confines of an unauthorized building project, is on private land,” said Mohammed Al-Hatib, one of the Palestinians who took residence in the building. “The state admitted before the High Court that this is private land.”

“After the Supreme Court ruling, it is forbidden to bring in new residents, and they continued doing so anyway,” Al-Hatib said. “Just as it is permissible to defend the interests of settlers in the area, we deserve to have our rights protected.”

“We moved into this place because it’s a beautiful territory and a wonderful area,” he added. “I sold my home in the village and moved here. This isn’t Matityahu East but Bil’in West.”

“[The ultra-Orthodox neighbors] chose to be my neighbors,” Al-Hatib said. “We knew we were coming to an area that is no picnic and I hope it will be quiet. We heard that they were planning a demonstration against us.”


6th July: One of three Palestinian familes moving into the shell of a house being built for Jewish colonists. Three families from Bil’in moved into the home currently under construction in the Modiin Ilit colony, built on their village land. (AFP/Abbas Momani)

In response, the Israel Defense Forces’ civil administration office in the territories said that the entrance of Palestinians into the building “is illegal and unauthorized.”

The documents which the Palestinians presented which are said to prove their ownership of the property is “an appeal which has yet to be accepted in the High Court of Justice.”

“It still does not prove that this is their property,” the civil administration office said. “We transferred the matter on to the army and the police and they are aware that we are talking about an illegal act.”

Prior to the evacuation, security forces were at the scene awaiting a decision by the IDF division commander and the civil administration office as to how to confront the squatters.

Municipal officials in Upper Modi’in say they have no connection to the affair, accusing the would-be inhabitants of attempting to apply pressure on the High Court prior to Sunday’s hearing over construction at the site.

“If the Arabs [in the structure] request that we provide them with services, we’ll have a problem on our hands,” said a source in the Upper Modi’in municipal council.

Over one month ago, Bil’in residents failed to prevent inhabitants from moving into two apartments in Matityahu East. An Israeli court banned would-be residents from moving into the neighborhood due to what it found to be building permits which were issued illegally.

Bil’in residents asked the police to prevent the Jewish families from moving into the apartments. The police replied that they could not act without a court-issued warrant and that the Palestinians either had to produce a warrant on their own or file a complaint.

In response, some residents sat down in front of the entrance to one of the apartments. Police arrived at the scene after attorney Michael Sfarad, who represents the Bil’in residents, issued a request to the IDF’s Binyamin regional commander.

Sfarad let it be known that if the police did not enforce the court’s ruling, he would file a court motion accusing law enforcement of ignoring judiciary authority.

The police were unable to prevent the new Jewish residents of the apartment from unloading their belongings and furniture from a moving truck.

For many more pictures, see the report on Indymedia Israel (Hebrew).