International Solidarity Movement - Page 1576 - Nonviolence. Justice. Freedom.

Un grupo de colonos ataca a palestinos y asedia a internacionales en Hebrón.

26 de noviembre 2005

Entre las 2 y las 5 pm de hoy, un grupo violento de colonos israelíes, entre 100 y 150, de fuera de Hebrón asediaron a 5 observadores por los Derechos Humanos (HROs) y a un periodísta fotógrafo, en el apartamento de los HROs en Tel Rumeida, Hebrón. Familias palestinas que eran el objetivo principal del odio de los colonos, también fueron asediadas. Otros colonos atacaron a palestinos en la ciudad en un día llamado para los judíos de “oración en masa” (mass prayer) en la Mezquita de Ibrahimi. ISM y los voluntarios del Proyecto Tel Rumeida contaron 6 asaltos a palestinos y 12 a HROs además de apedreamientos. La policía fue llamada en 8 ocasiones diferentes y el ejército7dco 4 veces, pero la mayoría de los casos nunca llegaron.

En uno de los incidentes en la calle Tel Rumeida, dos HROs estaban presentes cuando los colonos empezaron a tirar piedras a los tejados de los palestinos y también a los HROs. Los paneles solares del Basem Rajem local palestino, Abu-Aisha, se rompieron por las piedras lanzadas. En otro incidente, un HRO fue empujado de forma violenta por una de las tres chicas colonas que intentaban atacar a una colegiala, a la que estaba acompañando.

Los HROs se mantuvieron dispersados por las calles Tel Rumeida y Shuhaddah para ser testigos de la violencia desatada de los colonos, que era de esperar. Algunos hacían sus acompañamientos habituales a niños palestinos que volvían a casa desde la escuela. Los niños en Hebrón son atacados normalmente con piedras u otro tipo de violencia.

Escucharon alboroto cerca de su casa, que está a unos 100 m de la colonia de Tel Rumeida. Cuando llegaron había un grupo de unos 150 colonos tirando piedras a un pequeño grupo de jóvenes palestinos en la calle. Soldados israelíes impidieron a los colonos seguir a los palestinos. La policía pilló a uno de los colonos para arrestarlo. Estuvo retenido como 5 minutos antes de escapar de nuevo al mogollón de los colonos.Los soldados corrieron tras él pero la multitud les rodeó y se inició una refriega entre los colonos y los soldados. Uno de los HROs quiso tomar fotos del enfrentamiento pero se lo impidieron los colonos y los soldados. Los HROS intentaron acompañar a los palestinos a pesar del grupo hostil de colonos. Un colono con un rifle M16 automático, amenazó a uno de ellos mientras lo seguía, por lo que decidió entrar. Otros HROs encontraron refugio en sus apartamentos también, temiendo por su vida si salían. Al principio subieron a los tejados para observar lo que ocurría pero tuvieron que abandonarlo porque los colonos empezaron a tirarles piedras. Los colonos permanecieron fuera cantando en hebreo y lanzando lemas en inglés como “árabes no”.

Otras frases que dijeron los colonos durante este día fueron: “ muerte a los árabes”, “odiamos a todos los árabes”, “Los palestinos son animales que deberían de estar en jaula” “Deberían de estar en jaulas no sólo en Hebrón sino en cualquier lugar”, “Espero que Dios quema a toos los palestinos en el infierno”, “Ellos no son hombres son perros”.

Según la policía israelí y la militar, alrededor de 3000 colonos israelíes de los alrededores de Cisjordania y de Israel han venido a la ciudad palestina de Hebrón hoy para mostrar “solidaridad”con los pioneros de Hebrón, tal y como rezaba en su anuncio del día.

ABOUD REALIZA SU SEGUNDA MANIFESTACIÓN CONTRA EL MURO. por activistas del ISM

El viernes 25 de noviembre el pueblo de Aboud llevó a cabo su segunda manifestación, en dos semanas, contra la construcción del muro allí. El pueblo, junto a internacionales e israelíes que apoyan su causa, tomó fuerzas para mostrar su oposición a la construcción del muro en sus tierras de labor y la destrucción y robo que este conlleva. Cerca de 5330 dunams de su tierra, así como la totalidad de los recursos hídricos del pueblo serán confiscados por el muro del apartheid israelí.

Entorno a 300 manifestantes caminaron hacia el lugar donde las obras comenzarán en breve. Las fuerzas de ocupación israelí (IOF) tomaron nota la semana pasada y han venido más organizadas y violentas. Han ideado posiciones tácticas hacia las cuales pueden retroceder. Los jeeps permanecieron atrás, mejor que andar retrocediendo cada vez. La compañía de soldados fue diferente a la de la semana pasada ya que no reconocimos a nadie.Algunos de ellos llevaban cámaras y vídeos. Obtenían información grabando caras de las personas presentes, amenudo contra su propia voluntad. En la distancia, francotiradores israelíes observaban desde lo alto de las colinas ambos lados de la manifestación.

Cuando la manifestación llegó al primer montón de tierra que bloqueaba en camino, unos pocos soldados mostraban un mapa expresando que la zona es una “zona militar reservada”, como suele ser la táctica de las IOF para impedir las manifestaciones noviolentas. Fueron completamente ignorados por las manifestantes que continuaron el camino hacia el lugar de las obras. Un gran número de soldados de las IOF bloquearon el camino utilizando alambradas y su propia presencia. Casi inmediatamente intentaron dispersar a las manifestantes usando granadas de sonido y gases lacrimógenos. Este tipo de ataques contra un grupo no armado formado principalemente por hombres jóvenes, continuó a intérvalos regulares durante la manifestación. Sucedía cuando había intentos de movimiento para pasar a los soldados, o incluso sin razón aparente. Los soldados también pegaron, empujaron y daban patadas a la multitud.

Tres palestinos y un israelí fueron arrestados, incluyendo a Salaiman Khouri de 33 años, que intentó actuar como mediador, negociando con los soldados en hebreo. Como recompensa a sus esfuerzos recibió una herida en su brazo por los golpes de los soldados. Los cuatro fueron retenidos por una hora y fueron liberados tras la negociación, con la condición de que la manifestación fuera dispersada y se diera por finalizada. Uno de lso arrestado Abdullah Bhargouti de 24 años, fue gravemente herido después por los golpes realizados por los soldados con la culata de sus rifles y por las porras en la cabeza y el pecho. Su hermano Abdullah Raheem Bhargouti fue arrestado también. Durante una hora lo mantuvieron cautivo con una esposas extremadamente apretadas que le dejaron tremendas marcas en sus muñecas.

Después de la liberación, permaneción en el hospital durante 24 horas para recibir un chequo neurológico.

A pesar de la violencia de las IOF, la manifestación fue un éxito, entrando bastante adentro de las tierras del pueblo. Fue una gran acción en contra del muro.

Aboud Holds Second Demonstration Against the Wall

by ISM activists

On Friday the 25th of November the village of Aboud held it’s second demonstration in two weeks against the construction of the wall there. Joined by Israeli and international supporters, the village came out in force to show opposition to the construction of the wall on their agricultural land and the destruction and theft that will result from it. Over 5330 dunams of their land, as well as the whole of the water sources of the village will be confiscated by the Israeli apartheid barrier.

Around 300 protesters marched towards the site where construction will soon begin. The IOF had learned from last week and were far more organised and aggressive. They had organized regular tactical positions which they could fall back to. The jeeps were kept in the back, rather than falling back every time. It was possibly a different company of soldiers from last week as we did not recognise any of them. They had several soldiers with cameras – both video and still. They constantly gathered information, recording the faces of many of those present, often against their explicitly expressed will. In the distance, Israeli snipers could be clearly observed on the tops of the hills on both sides of the demonstration.

When the demonstration reached the first earth mound blocking the road, a few soldiers showed a map declaring the area a “closed military zone” – the usual IOF tactic to prevent non-violent demonstrations. They were largely ignored by the demonstrators who continued along the path towards the building site. At a tactically superior site in the road, a large number of IOF soldiers blocked the road, using razor wire and their own physical presence. Almost immediately, they attempted to disperse the protesters using sound grenades and tear gas. This assault on an unarmed crowd, consisting largely of young men, continued at regular intervals throughout the demonstration, often when there were attempts to move forward past the soldiers, though sometimes for no apparent reason. The soldiers also beat, punched and kicked people in the crowd.

Three Palestinians and one Israeli were arrested, including one Salaiman Khouri (33) who was trying to act as a de-escalating presence, negotiating with the soldiers in Hebrew. For his efforts he received a bloody wound to his arm from the soldier’s beatings. The four were held for over an hour, and were eventually released after negotiations, on condition that the demonstration end and disperse. One of the arrestees, Abdullah Bhargouti (24) was badly injured after being beaten with the soldiers rifle butts, and struck in the head and chest with their batons. His brother Abdullah Raheem Bhargouti was also arrested and held. For an hour they kept him captive using extremely tight handcuffs, which left marks on his arms.

After release, he was admitted to hospital for 24 hours, to allow neurological checks to be performed.

Despite the violence of the Israeli Occupation Forces, the demonstration was a success, pushing far into the land of the village. This acted as strong statement against the wall.

EL EJÉRCITO APRENDIENDO LA LECCIÓN EN BIL’IN por una activista del ISM Sarah

A las 12 pm comenzó la protesta semanal contra el muro del apartheid en Bil’in. Participaron unas 100 personas, mayormente hombres palestinos y unos 40 entre israelíes e internacionales.

El grupo caminó hacia las fueras de la aldea con una pancarta en la que se ilustraban varios mapas que representaban la variación de la tierra palestina en tres estadios: antes del reparto de las NU en 1948; otro de 1967 y un último del 2002 y 2005. En éste se veía nada más que Gaza y un enclave pequeño en Cisjordania. Siguiendo a los tres mapas se dibujaba un interrogante haciendo referencia al futuro.En el muro había unos 15 soldados esperando, pero el grupo decidió no continuar por ese camino sino atravesar los campos de olivos y llegar hasta las canteras producidas por las obras, donde otros 15 soldados esperaban.

Los manifestantes pasaron la barrera de los soldados sin que estos hicieran nada y algunos de los presentes escalaron hasta la parte alta de las caballeras del préstamo. Permanecieron allí durante 20 minutos, hasta que el número de soldados aumentó a 40. Estos comenzaron a empujar a la gente hacia abajo, produciéndose caídas tanto de los manifestantes como de los propios soldados. No hubo heridas de seriedad en el intento.

Los trabajos de movimiento de las tierras continuaron apesar de los presentes. Cuando los camiones circulaban alrededor de la zona ocupada, los manifestantos se sentaron en el camino, parando el movimiento por media hora con el consiguiente enfado de los conductores. Las piedras y la tierra del préstamo son utilizadas para los cimientos del muro.

Durante la sentada, la pancarta con los mapas de Palestina fue mantenida en alto, mientras una línea de soldados separaba a los manifestantes de la maquinaria. Uno de los manifestantes israelíes tuvo la oportunidad de ofrecer una lección de historia a los soldados presentes, durante 15 minutos. Iba señalando los mapas y mostrando el robo de la tierra, también hablaba de los planes del Primer Ministro Sharon e invitó a los soldados a que participaran.

Nadie del ejército tomó la palabra para hacer ningún tipo de comentario ni de pregunta. No resultaron ser buenos estudiantes, apesar de aparentar que prestaban atención.

Mientras unos pocos internacionales recitaban versos cambiando ¿Dónde han ido todas las flores? por ¿Dónde han ido todos los olivos?. Arrancados todos ellos, ¿Cuando aprenderán? y ¿Dónde han ido todos los soldados? Todos a ocupar Palestina, ¿Cuando aprenderán?.

Cuando el grupo se dispersó, el ejército lanzó gases lacrimógenos hacia la juventud que había bajado de los olivos. Alrededor de 25 botes fueron usados.

Repression and Resistance

1. Human Rights Observer to be Deported from Palestine by Israel
2. Mohammed Mansour’s trial update
3. Pastoral Calm Faces Military Might
4. Settlement Expansion Under the Guise of Security
__________

1. Human Rights Observer to be Deported from Palestine by Israel

November 24th, 2005

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

A Human Rights Observer (HRO) from the UK was arrested in Tel Rumeida, Hebron earlier today. He had just finished escorting Palestinian children to school and was walking home on Shuhaddah street when he was stopped by an armed Border Police unit in a targeted arrest.

He was informed that his visa had expired but explained that he had been given an appointment with the Ministy of the Interior (MoI) for renewal. He had applied for this renewal before his visa had expired and was given an appointment in three weeks time, as is the usual practice of the MoI. He produced documents to prove this appointment. These documents were refused and he alone was put into a Border Police van and taken to Abrahim Avinu police station.

He has had an immediate hearing tonight with the MoI, not attended by any lawyer or independent witnesses. The MoI. decided on his deportation without hearing any representation from him or his lawyer. He now waits in the Ramleh Deportation Centre near Tel Aviv to be sent home.

This HRO has been working in Tel Rumeida for a number of months. His primary role has been in escorting Palestinian children to and from Qurtuba Primary School as they are subjected to stoning and physical assault by settlers from the Tel Rumeida and Beit Haddassa settlements on a daily basis. This area of Hebron has seen some of the worst settler violence against local Palestinians. The police have been at best apathetic toward this violence and at worst, have accommodated it. He and other HROs are regularly harassed and threatened with arrest by police.

Only last week, this HRO met with members of the Israeli Knesset to discuss the security situation with settlers and the difficulties with the Civil and Border Police in Tel Rumeida. HROs have been stoned, spat at and had their life threatened on numerous occasions by settlers communities for the work they do. The absence of HRO’s would give settlers carte blanche to do as they wish to Palestinians and their land without any international witnesses.

For more information please call :

ISM Media office: +972 2 297.1824
Gabi laski (attorney): +972 544.418.988

__________

2. Mohammed Mansour’s trial update

On the 22nd of November during the most recent Hearing of Palestinian nonviolent organiser Mohammed Mansour from Biddu, court case the prosecution finally gave up on getting Mohammed Mansour to agree to stop participating in demonstrations for the next two years and pay a 3,500 shekel fine of his own free will.

“I would prefer to go to jail than pay one shekel to the Occupation. It is not I, but those that build the wall that are the criminals” said Mohammed.

In the next session, set for the 10th of January the Judge will begin hearing witnesses. Mohammed was initially arrested in June 2004 at a nonviolent demonstration in Al Ram. Undercover Israeli agents stormed the crowd and many, including Mohammed and a Palestinian photographer for “Yediot Ahronot,” a large Israeli newspaper, were severely beaten. Mohammed was hospitalised and then held for a week before his release on bail together with another three Palestinians, including two minors, who were arrested at the Al Ram demonstration. Five Israeli peace activists, also arrested at the demonstration, were released a few hours following their arrest.

Mohammed is being charged with assaulting a police officer, throwing stones and presiding illegally in an “Israeli area.”

Mohammed’s trail is taking place while sixteen nonviolent activists from the village of Bil’in are currently in jail in an attempt to crush the nonviolent resistance in the village.

The International Solidarity Movement condemns the Israeli legal system defense of war crimes committed by the Israeli military and settlers and its criminalization of nonviolent protest against the Occupation and Apartheid wall.

Picture here:
https://www.palsolidarity.org/main/2005/11/24/mohammed-mansours-trial-update/

__________

3. Pastoral Calm Faces Military Might

by Asa and Sarah
At 11am on Tuesday the 22nd of November residents of the Tubas area held a dignified demonstration against the Israeli checkpoint near Tayasir village. Around 100 Palestinians were joined by about 25 Israeli and international supporters. The shebab (youth) of the region were mostly in school at the time, so the demonstration was mostly made up of mature, respected men of the community as well as several local women.
Protesters marched towards the checkpoint where they significantly outnumbered the IOF presence. It would have been relatively easy for the group to occupy the checkpoint non-violently, which must have been clear to the soldiers too. However, the organisers of the demonstration had decided beforehand on a non-confrontational approach. For around an hour the protesters stood facing the soldiers holding banners and signs with slogans such as “Yes to the application of international law” (in Arabic), and “Checkpoint = Chokepoint” (in English). The protest included a time of prayer for the Muslim men who were in attendance.
During the quiet assembly, the checkpoint guard continued to increase in number, presumably in anticipation of a checkpoint breach. Also two snipers assumed position on a roof in the military compound and maintained constant sight on the group. The soldiers were to be frustrated that they did not provoke a violent reaction, and the only activity at the checkpoint was the arrival of the Israeli activists who refused to show their IDs while joining the group assembled on the western entrance. There were intervals of chanting and the sound of an F16 and two helicopters flying in the vicinity but otherwise all was calm.
At the signal of the the Palestinian leadership, the assembly dispersed quietly.
The Palestinian Agricultural Relief Committee (PARC) in Tubas organised the demonstration to draw attention to the nature of the occupation in the isolated Tubas region. Over the last year the checkpoint has cut Palestinian villages in the area off from each other and Palestinians from their agricultural land.
The villages of Bardala, Ein Al Beda, Cardala and Wadi Al Malech are in an enclave in the Jordan Valley, the only entry and exit point to which is the Tayasir checkpoint. Anyone who is not registered on their I.D. card as being from these villages or has a time limited permit is forbidden to enter by the Israeli military. In order to be allowed to move freely many residents of this village have registered there addresses in Tubas itself. Now, if they leave their villages they are forbidden to return.
Tayaseer and Aqaba are in an area considered a “Military Zone”. Occupation officials have made no secret of their opinion that Aqaba “just should not be there”. Recently the military confiscated villagers sheep and burnt there grazing grounds. According to Ha’aretz (26th March 1999), 8 villagers from the village were killed and 43 wounded by the Israeli military between 1967 when they “adopted” it as a training facility and September 2000 when they were forced to pull out after the village brought a successful case against the them to the Israeli high court. More recently, the military declared all the village homes to be “illegally built” and threatened to demolish the whole village, issuing demolition orders in the village. These efforts were defeated by international protests.
Although one village in the area removed the military through legal action, it was clear to us that the region is still very much used by the IOF as a training grounds. The military presence in the air and on the ground during the protest was in stark contrast to the calm face of the locals and the action they orgainsed.
Pictures here:
https://www.palsolidarity.org/main/2005/11/23/pastoral-calm-faces-military-might/

__________

4. Settlement Expansion Under the Guise of Security

CORRECTION: both demonstrations start at 12pm tomorrow, and not 1pm as previously stated.

Two villages rise up against the wall tomorrow

[Ramallah District] The West Bank villages if Bil’in and Abud will both march to the construction sites of the Annexation Wall on their land Friday, November 25 at 12:00 PM. The Abud and Bil’in protest marches are part of the ongoing efforts of Palestinians to stop the destruction of their land and the ghettoization of their communities. Palestinians, joined by Israelis and internationals, have conducted almost weekly protests, marches, direct actions and other forms of civil resistance and disobedience since the beginning of the construction of the wall in 2002.

Abud, a village of approximately 2200 Christian and Muslim Palestinians, will lose over 4,000 dunams (about a 1,000 acres) of its land due to the route of the barrier. The route of the wall around Abud is designed to enable the unapproved planned expansion of the Ofarim and Beit Arye settlements. Both of these settlements are illegal under international law.

The village of Bil’in, now a symbol of persistent community organizing and cooperation between Palestinians and Israelis in the struggle against the wall, is losing over 60% of its agricultural land to the construction of the barrier. The route of the wall in Bil’in will de-facto annex the village’s farmland for the planned expansion of the illegal Modi’in Elite settlement.

Abud and Bil’in are not alone. According to a report from Israeli human rights organization B’tselem, “ the currently approved route of the Barrier leaves fifty-five settlements, twelve of them in East Jerusalem, separated from the rest of the West Bank and contiguous with the State of Israel. Study of a map of the route indicates that in most of the cases… the Barrier’s route was set hundreds, and even thousands, of meters from the houses at the edge of the settlements.”

The B’tselem report also shows that not only were security-related reasons of secondary importance to the Israeli government in certain locations, but that in cases where security concerns conflicted with settlement expansion, the planners opted to enable expansion at the expense of security.

__________

For more reports, journals and action alerts visit the ISM website at www.palsolidarity.org

Please consider supporting the International Solidarity Movement’s work with a financial contribution. You may donate securely through our website at www.palsolidarity.org/main/donations/