CNN editors pull Palestinian quotes, replace with US

by cnnexposed.com

CNN editors replaced all Palestinian quotations with quotes from the US and Israel in its story ‘U.S. vetoes U.N. condemnation of Israel’s Gaza strikes’. The new, more prominent article begins with the exact same wording as the original, but all Palestinian remarks are gone.

The two versions have identical first and second paragraphs:

———-
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) — The United States vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution Saturday that would have condemned Israel for its military operations in Gaza.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said the resolution, which also called for Israel to immediately cease military operations in the Palestinian territory, was “biased against Israel and politically motivated.”
———-

The original wire followed with:

———-
The U.S. veto angered Hamas government spokesman Ghazi Hamad, who called the veto “shameful” and “not the first time” the United States has used a veto “just to protect Israel.”

The veto, Hamad said, is to “give Israel covering in order to continue its massacres and killings among our people. It is giving legitimacy to Israel to continue the aggression against our people.”
———-

But CNN editors pulled these two paragraphs, replacing them with a description of the resolution and vote tally, followed by a quotation from the Israeli military. It ended with five paragraphs quoting US Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton.

CNN neglected well-known journalistic standards when it removed Palestinian statements from its original report. According to Wikipedia.org’s Journalism entry, journalists must use “multiple original sources of information, especially if the subject of the report is controversial” and must “report every side of a story possible”.

CNN took an unethical step backwards when it morphed the responsible 4:37AM wire into a biased Sunday afternoon article.

Full text of the original wire:
———-
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) — The United States vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution Saturday that would have condemned Israel for its military operations in Gaza.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said the resolution, which also called for Israel to immediately cease military operations in the Palestinian territory, was “biased against Israel and politically motivated.”

The U.S. veto angered Hamas government spokesman Ghazi Hamad, who called the veto “shameful” and “not the first time” the United States has used a veto “just to protect Israel.”

The veto, Hamad said, is to “give Israel covering in order to continue its massacres and killings among our people. It is giving legitimacy to Israel to continue the aggression against our people.”

The resolution, proposed by the Qatar delegation, particularly condemned Israel for Wednesday’s shelling in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun that killed 18 people, mostly women and children.

The proposal also condemns Palestinians who fire missiles from Gaza into Israel. (Posted 4:37 a.m.)
———-

Full text of the edited article:
———-
POSTED: 2:21 p.m. EST, November 11, 2006
UNITED NATIONS (CNN) — The United States vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution Saturday that would have condemned Israel for its military operations in Gaza.

U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton said the resolution, which also called for Israel to cease military operations immediately in the Palestinian territory, was “biased against Israel and politically motivated.”

Qatar proposed the motion, which focused on Wednesday’s shelling in the northern Gaza town of Beit Hanoun that killed 18 people, mostly women and children. (Watch mourners carry bodies of victims through the streets — 1:49)

The blocked resolution also condemned Palestinians who fire missiles from Gaza into Israel.

Israel’s military said it has been targeting militants in Beit Hanoun who have been firing Qassam rockets into Israel, and blamed a “technical failure” for the misfire that killed the 18 civilians.

The United States cast the only vote against. Four council members abstained and 10 voted for the resolution.

Before the vote, Bolton said the United States joined the other countries in “deeply regretting” the injuries and loss of life in Wednesday’s shelling, but said Israel has promised a full investigation.

Bolton said the resolution’s text was “unbalanced.”

“We are disturbed at the language of the resolution that is in many places biased against Israel and politically motivated,” Bolton said. “Such language does not further the cause of peace and its unacceptability to the United States in previous resolutions is well known.”

Bolton said the text was wrong in equating what he called Israel’s legal defense operations in Gaza with Palestinian acts of terrorism against civilians in Israel.

“We are disturbed that there is not a single reference to terrorism in the proposed resolution, nor any condemnation of the Hamas leadership’s statement that Palestinians should resume terror attacks on a broad scale, or calls by the military wing of Hamas to Muslims worldwide to strike American targets and interests,” he said.
———-

Full CNN Story

Ma’ariv: “Forbidden by the High Court, Built by Construction Companies, Approved by State Prosecutor”

translated from the Hebrew orginal by Rann Bar-On

The [Israeli] state prosecutor is singing from two hymn sheets: it submitted a document to the High Court condemning illegal construction in Modi’in Ilit, but is also asking to legalize it to ease the lives of residents.

by Efrat Forsher, November 2nd

Ignoring the High Court

Despite a court order that expressly forbids the continuation of illegal construction in the Matityahu East neighborhood in Modi’in Ilit, and at the height of a criminal investigation, an access road was suddenly opened up connecting some of the houses in the neighborhood to the main road leading to the city. The state prosecutor explained to the High Court that it sees these illegal acts in a severe light, as they ignored an explicit court order. However, in the same breath and totally in opposition to its stated position, the state prosecutor asked the judges to approve the construction for humanitarian reasons.

The High Court is currently debating a motion filed by the ‘Peace Now’ movement following an investigation by ‘B’tselem’ and ‘Ba’Makom’ that exposed the existence of plans for the expansion of the ultra-orthodox settlement Modi’in Ilit on private Palestinian land. The motion asks the High Court to cancel the plans, including the construction of 3000 residence units.

According to the appelants, the land was expropriated from the residents of [Palestinian village] Bil’in, and the work began without permits being issued. When the motion was filed, 750 residence units had already been built, some of which were occupied.

Two days after the motion was filed, the High Court issued an order forbidding the continuation of construction in the neighborhood, the occupation of the residence units and the continuation of sales. The momentum of construction was halted and the residence units were left standing bare at various stages of construction, with the exception of around eighty that were previously occupied by families.

The Court Order was Scaled Down – and Broken

Later on, the state prosecutor admitted that the construction plans hadn’t been approved. The national police unit for the investigation of fraud is now conducting a criminal investigation into the suspected illegal construction.

After the motions were filed, the planners made several changes to the plan and refiled it. This time, they designated five enclaves of private land belonging to Palestinian residents of Bil’in. It was stated that in all of those areas where construction had previously taken place, the land will be returned to its former state, the areas will be fenced off and will be covered in soil.

In July the High Court scaled down its order so that work can begin. The High Planning Council in the Area of Judea and Samaria also gave the companies ‘Green Park’ and ‘Green Mount’, the partners in the project, permission to act. As part of the works, the enclaves were fenced off
and the roads crossing them that lead to the populated area, Hetziva B, were destroyed.

However, something else also happened. Despite the High Court order, another road was prepared last month, running from the populated area and connecting to the road to the city of Modi’in Ilit. To build this road, gravel was removed, potholes blocked up, the soil was compacted and infrastructure prepared for the paving of the road, all of which will pass through the ‘disputed area’.

A Request for ‘Temporary Approval’

Employees of the Civilian Administration on a tour of the area were surprised to see construction equipment working on the road and ordered an immediate halt to the work.

In a document the state prosecutor filed last week with the High Court, it states that construction and development were carried out against the court order, the construction permits and the plan, and emphasizes the gravity of these acts. In the same breath, the state prosecutor requests ‘temporary approval’ of the bypass road, justifying this by saying that ‘humanitarian concerns’ have arisen. It argues that the fencing-off of the enclaves has cut off access for the resident population that due to its socio-economic situation relies almost entirely on public transport.

At the moment, everyone is waiting for the High Court to decide in the matter. The residents of the neighborhood are hoping that the High Court will approve the road and will rescue them from the isolation that was imposed on them. The Palestinians, on the other hand, are hoping that the enclaves, which they say were stolen from them, will be returned to their owners.

The Justice Ministry responded that “the state believes that the residents of the populated buildings in the Matityahu East neighborhood have no connection to the illegal construction carried out by the construction companies. Since the court allowed the continued residence of the populated buildings, and the only means of access of public and emergency vehicles to the populated area was cut off, an impossible situation was created that is impossible to ignore.”

“The Only Means of Access was Cut Off”

Additionally it was written that “the state has no choice but to approve the completion of the construction of the access road within the appropriate legal framework as suggested by the state in its response to the High Court. We emphasize that this does not lessen the gravity of the acts carried out on the land.”

Yariv Openheimer, the general secretary of ‘Peace Now’ attacked the conduct of the state prosecutor and said that “the prosecutor is compounding crime upon crime and is attempting to approve illegal construction. In doing so, it is turning the High Court decision into a sad joke. The state must act against those who break the law, not cooperate with them.”

The ‘Green Park’ and ‘Green Mount’ companies who carried out the construction stated that the residents opposed the destruction of their only means of access to the populated area that passed through the third enclave, in part using physical obstructions.

Representatives of the families conducted negotiations with the construction company and agreed that the possibility of a temporary access road be looked in to as an interim solution: “the approval of the road was done without malice, and without violating any judicial order. Construction was halted the moment the civilian administration ordered it.”

The Modi’in Ilit local council did not respond to the matter prior to the handing down of the High Court verdict.

See also these previous stories on the ISM website:

Haaretz: “Activists: Security forces fired live ammo at anti-fence protest”

by Itim, November 3rd

Anti-fence activists on Friday claimed security forces fired live ammunition at them during a protest near the West Bank town of Bil’in, moderately wounding a French activist.

Doctors at a Ramallah hospital who treated the man said his wounds were caused by a live bullet. An IDF spokesperson, however, denied the allegations, claiming security forces at the demonstration made use only of tear gas and rubber-coated bullets.

Activists at the demonstration claim they have video footage of security forces shooting live ammunition.

Two Palestinian youths at the demonstration sustained light wounds from rubber-coated bullets fired by security forces.

Some 100 protesters took part in the weekly rally which has become the focus point in anti-fence groups’ efforts to stop the erection of the barrier which they say infringes on the rights of Palestinians.

MK Dov Hanin (Hadash) called on Defense Minister Amir Peretz, to investigate the army’s crowd dispersal techniques and added that “it’s important to act now before a lethal tragedy occurs to the citizens of Bil’in.

Guardian: “Israeli barrier and settlement to leave West Bank village with nowhere to go”

from The Guardian, Monday 30th October. by Rory McCarthy in Wadi Fukin

Land confiscation and pollution threaten future of ancient farming community

From his rooftop, Mohammad Ibrahim can see from one end to the other of the narrow valley that contains the village of Wadi Fukin. Beyond houses bunched around the tall minaret of the mosque is terraced farmland, most of it covered with olive trees or planted deep in cabbage, cucumber, radish, lettuce and squash, irrigated by dozens of small reservoir pools linked to the valley’s 11 ancient springs.

It is this view of Wadi Fukin, a village of 1,200 Palestinians just inside the occupied West Bank, that has long attracted Israeli tourists, who hike and swim in the reservoirs. The ancient farming practices have created a “unique cultural landscape” deserving of world heritage status, says Gidon Bromberg, Israeli director of Friends of the Earth Middle East.

But this is no longer all Mr Ibrahim sees. On the hills to the south and east of the village is a rapidly expanding ultra-orthodox Jewish settlement built on Palestinian land seized by the Israeli government and declared “state land”.

On the opposite hills, to the north and west, is the proposed route for the latest stretch of the vast concrete and steel West Bank barrier. The 437-mile barrier is halfway complete and work continues despite a July 2004 advisory opinion from the international court of justice in The Hague, which said it was a violation of international law and should be taken down where it crosses into the West Bank. Israel argues that the barrier is a necessary security measure that has reduced the number of suicide bombings.

Within months, the village will be sandwiched between the growing settlement of Beitar Illit and the barrier, with a large chunk of its farmland gone. Confiscation orders have been issued for land that villagers have cultivated for generations. Mr Ibrahim was told that 12 hectares (30 acres) of his father’s land is to be taken.

“I think the worst is yet to come,” said Mr Ibrahim, 50, a teacher at the village primary school. “We are totally dependent on that farmland.” He believes the settlement and the barrier together are designed to squeeze out the villagers. “I think what they want is that after they have done this there will come a time when we call a taxi to take us out of here for good,” he said.

Local concern

Mr Ibrahim’s neighbour Abu Mazen works with him on a village committee against the barrier and is equally concerned. “At the beginning I was full of hope that the wall wouldn’t be put into place because of the crowds that visit. But the reality tells me they are going to build this wall,” he said. “They are the ones dividing two communities from each other.”

Israel’s prime minister, Ehud Olmert, was elected in the spring on a policy of withdrawing from some of the smaller West Bank settlements and annexing larger blocs behind a new, unilaterally drawn final border. Since the Lebanon war, that policy has been shelved. But the reality on the ground is that the military occupation continues and the settlements and the barrier grow apace.

Since construction started in Beitar Illit in 1985 its population has increased to 28,000 and it is now one of the fastest growing settlements in the West Bank. In May, the Israeli defence minister and Labour leader, Amir Peretz, issued an expansion order for Beitar Illit and three other West Bank settlements – the first such order for some years. In September, tenders were issued for 342 new houses in the settlement and now homes are being built, with truck-loads of rubble dumped down the hillsides every few minutes. Overflow pipes regularly eject raw sewage on to some of the village fields, forcing farmers to stop growing crops.

“Beitar Illit is the biggest construction site in the West Bank. It has enormous growth every year,” said Dror Etkes, who runs Settlement Watch at the Israeli organisation Peace Now. Houses are on sale at much cheaper prices than in Jerusalem, 10 miles away, and cheap, regular transport is laid on for settlers heading into the capital.

The settlement’s expansion is in defiance of the 2003 “road map” for peace negotiations put forward by the US, Europe, Russia and the UN, which calls for a freeze in settlement activity.

Like other Palestinian villages threatened by settlements or the arrival of the barrier, Wadi Fukin is hoping to fight its case in court. But the village has also found support from within Israel. Friends of the Earth has campaigned hard to protect the valley, warning that the recharge of the village springs is threatened by the expansion of the settlement and the arrival of the barrier, which here will be a 50-metre-wide strip of land including a steel fence with barbed wire barriers, a ditch, two patrol roads, two “intrusion-tracking dirt roads” and observation cameras.

Israelis in the town of Tzur Hadassah, which is over the hill from Wadi Fukin, have also taken up the campaign. Some are motivated by ecological concerns, others by political opposition to the settlements and the barrier.

Dudy Tzfati, 45, a lecturer in biology and genetics at Hebrew University and one of the campaigners from Tzur Hadassah, admits that not everyone in the town supports their work. “Most of the mainstream like the concept of separation and the idea of the fence, to not have to see the Palestinians and the suffering, to have them behind a wall and then we won’t have to deal with what is going on there,” he said.

Partly as a result of lobbying from the Israeli side, a senior defence ministry official visited Wadi Fukin and Tzur Hadassah last week to listen to the concerns, although there is no indication of any change in the plans for the settlement or barrier.

Scepticism

Among villagers, there was deep scepticism at first about the support from their Israeli neighbours. Some are still doubtful about their motivation. “They are helping us because they want it to be a reservation, like a national park. They are Israeli citizens and will ultimately think for their own benefit,” said Jamal Hamid, 46, a farmer living at the north end of the village.

However, many appear to have accepted the support gratefully. “These people are very fair,” said Atef Manasra, an Arabic teacher at the village school. “The difference between the people of Tzur Hadassah and the settlers in Beitar Illit is like the difference between the sky and the earth.”

Yet few believe the campaign by either side will be enough to change Wadi Fukin’s future and villagers worry about a future isolated from the markets in Jerusalem and Bethlehem and from access to the rest of the West Bank. “This wall is nothing to do with security,” said Mr Ibrahim. “On the contrary it is to besiege the Palestinian people economically, to prevent workers from working inside Israel and, most importantly, to consume more land.”

The Independent: “Music therapy: The pied piper of Balata”

by Donald Macintyre, 30th October

The Palestinian children of the West Bank grow up amid the sounds of guns and bombs. But a project inspired by Professor Nigel Osborne is determined to help them listen to a different tune. Donald Macintyre reports

The Reid Professor of Music at Edinburgh University, and one of Britain’s foremost contemporary composers, is somehow managing simultaneously to play the guitar, dance, and conduct a class of 30 children in their lusty performance – in Mandinga – of a West African folk song.

The song, he has explained to the children sitting round him, concerns a cunning spider, who, uninvited to a village feast, beguiles a villager who comes down to the nearby river for water, so that he never returns. Then another villager is sent. And so on, until the whole village has been mesmerised by the spider’s magical drumming. And then the spider runs to the now deserted village and consumes the feast.

The children, armed with shakers, triangles, chime bars and drums, enthusiastically beat out the rhythm as the words of the chorus – roughly transliterated as “Pigin do me so, kongo ayeri, ayeri kongo”- resounds through the open windows of the community centre, bringing to life a song created more than 1,000 years and a continent away.

The electricity brought to this room by the multi-tasking Nigel Osborne would be surprising enough even if it was not happening in the heart of the West Bank’s most populous-and most problematic- Palestinian refugee camp, scene of some of the worst bloodshed during the past six years of conflict.

This is Balata, a stronghold of armed militancy and the target of at times almost daily Israeli incursions, where 150 Palestinians have been killed since the intifada began six years ago. It is also one of the most densely populated places on earth, home to 30,000 civilians who live in less than two square kilometres of cement-block housing packed so closely together that fat people cannot squeeze into some of the alleys between them.

Professor Osborne, whose works have been performed by orchestras across the world from the Berlin Symphony to the Los Angeles Philharmonic, who has seen his operas play at Glyndebourne and the English National Opera, has come to Nablus to practise what he has preached for more than a decade: the huge potential of music to rehabilitate war-traumatised children.

He first asks the children to join him in singing a melodic African chant, increasing the volume and then reducing it to a whisper. Then he has them clap in time. Then he introduces them, still clapping, to the rhythm, then, with his guitar, to the tune, and then finally – for those that need it – to the words of an old Arab song: Aya Zeyn al-Abidin/Ir Wrd, Ir Wrd/Imfitah Baynil/Besatin [“Zeyn ul Abidin, you are like a rose that blooms in the garden”.]

“I have loved Arabic music for a long time – longer than you,” he tells the children through the interpreter Assim Eshtaya, 27, a school counsellor in Nablus. “I won’t say more, but longer. Now the notes in the song we learnt come from a very old traditional Arab scale.” He plays the notes on his guitar. “Now I have a proposal. Would you like to create a new song with Arabic music?”

And so, with Professor Osborne allowing the children to decide the words of the song, which he suggests should be about friendship, and then to choose the melody, note by note, the song comes into being: “Dear friends, friends for ever, friends for ever,” the whole group sings in Arabic.

Professor Osborne is here to support a project which he has inspired but which has been run by a tireless fellow Scot, trained counsellor and unpaid volunteer Sheena Boyle, who spent much of the summer training fourth-year Palestinian psychology students to oversee music sessions for traumatised children.

A UN children’s fund report in January declared that “Palestinian children are showing increasing signs of psychosocial distress, manifested in aggressive behaviour, low achievement, nightmares and bedwetting.” Palestinian social workers say that in a place like Balata, almost every child is traumatised to a greater or lesser extent.

Samia Tangi, 12, is the fifth of seven children. She has lived with an aunt since her divorced mother was jailed for helping to prepare a bomb for an attack in Israel. Her father is absent in Jordan. Samia, whose aunt says she weeps a lot, seems to enjoy being here. “I like what you are doing,” she tells Professor Osborne through the translator. “I liked it when we sang ‘Aya Zeyn’.” She shyly shows visitors two of the drawings she is keeping for her mother’s eventual return. One shows the refugee camp at night; the gate of her school – the sign Balata Girl’s School clearly written; Israeli helicopters flying over head; tanks in the streets, a boy throwing stones at them. Another – entitled “mum’s day” has a heart and a lighted candle.

Doha Bakr, 13, was six when she saw the body of her 18-year- old brother brought home at the beginning of the intifada. Her account, delivered without emotion fastens on a seemingly extraneous detail; how he had told his mother that he wanted to take a shower, but hearing the water would take time to heat up, walked to the nearby Jacob’s Well, never to return alive. He may have been throwing stones; he was shot in the head.

Mahmoud Diab, 12, is the boisterous life and soul of today’s session, shooting out his suggestion for the words like a rapper. Mrs Boyle says his mother told her he is unpopular because he is “too clever”, though at the music session he has made more friends. Like many children in the camp, Mahmoud still occasionally wets his bed. Yet he is politically precocious, saying he supports Hamas because “everyone is against them” . His mother said before the sessions started that he wanted to be a suicide bomber when he grew up; today, at any rate, he says he wants to be a ” scientist and a leader in an Islamic band”. He adds: “I like it here because it is fun and we make new friends.”

Professor Osborne’s belief in the therapeutic and transformational power of music in the most unpromising circumstances is no passing fad. He graduated in music from Oxford in the late 1960s (where as the composer of a Cinderella produced by Gyles Brandreth, he coached Eliza Manningham-Buller, future head of the British Security Service, to sing for her part as the fairy godmother).

He was a music therapist for a spell as a young man but it was as a human rights activist, enraged by the failure of the international community to protect Bosnia from Serb aggression, that he went to Sarajevo in 1993.

Horrified by the impact of the siege on children, he devised, with two Bosnian artists, the idea of running creative workshops for children caught up in the conflict. “The idea was just so the children could have a bit of fun,” he recalls. “I was surprised how the therapeutic idea emerged out of it.” For a visionary who has worked in several conflict zones, including Chechnya and Georgia, Professor Osborne has an unexpected streak of humility. He is careful to distinguish between clinical music therapy and the kind of session he is doing in Nablus, or those he ran in Sarajevo, and west Bosnia, where he was inevitably called – at least by journalists – “the Pied Piper of Mostar”.

But ever since noticing what he has described as the “palpable wave of energy” emanating from the Sarajevo children, he has believed passionately that “music assists these [traumatised] children, helping communication between individuals and within groups, creating trust joy, safety, cognitive repair and the incomparable self-esteem brought by creativity.”

In a forthcoming – and in part highly technical – paper, he also reviews recent scientific findings on the physical effects of music on the one hand and post-traumatic stress on the other to make a persuasive case that music can be useful in regulating some functions of the body, such as heartbeat and breathing, known to be disturbed by repeated shock or fear.

Post-traumatic stress causes in different victims the opposite extremes of both “hyperarousal”and unusually subdued behaviour, he says and describes how in his experience in Bosnia: “It was not unusual for generally melancholic and reticent groups to leave a session laughing or dancing, or groups … of hyperactive children to leave calm and focused.”

Certainly, the Balata community leaders seem delighted with the success of the project. Mrs Boyle’s July training sessions involved 90 children in three Nablus refugee camps – with others having to be turned away. ” During the month, the results were clear for everyone to see,” said Shaer Badawi of Balata’s Yafa centre. “The children were happier.”

Balata is a bleak place to grow up. Almost every alley and lane is decorated with a “martyr poster” showing dead men and boys carrying guns, whether they were in fact militants or not. These provide almost the only role model for young boys. On a tour of the camp, Professor Osborne met a nine-year-old boy who every day visits the grave of his father, a dead militant, while – not untypically – brandishing a frighteningly realistic toy M16.

Professor Osborne has no illusions that music will somehow stop all young people picking up real guns in the future. But he says: “I hope we can offer an alternative path, a path where human energy can be put to creative, not destructive purposes.”

The problem, of course, is money. Kamal Shoraty, the Palestinian co-ordinator of the project, would like to extend it across the West Bank. But the summer sessions were run on a shoestring budget of around £6,300; there are not even enough simple musical instruments for more than one session at a time.

Professor Osborne says that if he was Swedish he would have direct access to funds from the country’s development agency. But the Government has so far rejected appeals for funding, which depends on a few individual donors and Rotarian-type fund-raising events in Scotland. Yet Professor Osborne calculates that a mere £50,000 would allow children in eight Nablus centres to take part in one session a week throughout the year.

At a meeting of Balata community leaders last Friday to express their appreciation to Professor Osborne and Mrs Boyle, Ahmed Dwaikat, of the Palestinian union of psychologists and social workers, said that the musical sessions have helped to a “better view of school” in depressed and underperforming children. But that’s not all. “Here children feel they have to grow up very fast,” he said. “We want to give them the feeling that it’s all right to be a child, to enjoy the things that are for children.”